Brown v. Boston Scientific Corporation, No. 2:2015cv12866 - Document 33 (S.D.W. Va. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that defendant, BSC, is dismissed without prejudice; no defendants remain; the Clerk is directed to close the case and strike it from the active docket. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 10/27/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kew)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Brown v. Boston Scientific Corporation Doc. 33 Case 2:15-cv-12866 Document 33 Filed 10/27/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 203 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION JACQUELINE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-12866 BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, Defendant. MEMORANADUM OPINION AND ORDER On September 25, 2020, I entered an order directing plaintiff to show cause on or before October 26, 2020, why her case should not be dismissed as to Boston Scientific Corporation (“BSC”) for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 41.1 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has not responded to the Show Cause Order. The court ORDERS, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 41.1 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure and after weighing the factors identified in Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93, 95 (4th Cir. 1989), that defendant, BSC, is dismissed without prejudice. No defendants remain, and the court DIRECTS the Clerk to close the case and strike it from the active docket. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party. ENTER: October 27, 2020 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
