Miller v. Clifford et al, No. 2:2015cv01581 - Document 19 (S.D.W. Va. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 18 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge; granting the defendants' 16 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing this matter from the docket of the court. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 7/27/2017. (cc: plaintiff; all counsel of record; Magistrate Judge Tinsley) (mks)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Miller v. Clifford et al Doc. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON ANDREW MILLER, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 2:15-01581 MARGARET CLIFFORD, Lt., and JOHN DOE, Officer, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The court having received the Proposed Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley, filed on June 29, 2017, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); and having reviewed the record in this proceeding; and there being no objections filed by any party to the proposed findings and recommendation; and it appearing proper so to do, it is ORDERED that the findings and conclusions made in the proposed findings and recommendation of the magistrate judge be, and they hereby are, adopted by the court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 16) be, and hereby is, granted. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this matter is dismissed from the docket of the court. Dockets.Justia.com The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this written opinion and order to the plaintiff, all counsel of record, and the United States Magistrate Judge. ENTER: July 27, 20172016 DATED: January 5, John T. Copenhaver, Jr. United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
