Curtis v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al, No. 2:2014cv21517 - Document 20 (S.D.W. Va. 2019)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM AND OPINION directing that the defendants, TSL and Bard, are dismissed without prejudice; no other defendants remain and this case is stricken from the docket and closed. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 8/8/2019. (cc: counsel of record; plaintiff at her last known address) (kew)

Download PDF
Curtis v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al Doc. 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION IN RE: C.R. BARD, INC. PELVIC REPAIR SYSTEM PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION ------------------------------------------------THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO MDL No. 2187 Tonya Curtis v. C.R. Bard, Inc., et al. 2:14-cv-021424 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On July 10, 2019, I granted a motion to show cause filed by Tissue Sciences Laboratories Limited (“TSL”). [ECF No. 18]. Defendant C. R. Bard, Inc. (“Bard”) later joined in the motion to show cause. [ECF No. 20]. TSL, joined by Bard, asserts that plaintiff’s case should be dismissed with prejudice for failure to comply with court orders, including the failure to timely provide the defendants with required pretrial discovery in violation of Pretrial Order Numbers 275 and 283. The motion was returned undeliverable. [ECF No. 18]. Plaintiff, who is pro se, has not responded to the above pleadings. The court entered the Show Cause Order on July 10, 2019, directing plaintiff to show cause on or before July 24, 2019, why TSL should not be dismissed. [ECF No. 19]. The court sent a copy of this order to plaintiff at her last known address and posted it on the court’s public website. The Order was returned undeliverable. [ECF No. 21]. Plaintiff did not show cause or otherwise respond. The court finds, pursuant to Rules 16 and 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and after weighing the factors identified in Wilson v. Volkswagen of Am., Dockets.Justia.com Inc., 561 F.2d 494, 503-06 (4th Cir. 1977), that this case should be dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff’s failure to respond to the show cause order and otherwise comply with discovery deadlines in compliance with the court’s previous pretrial and other orders. Therefore, the court ORDERS that the defendants, TSL and Bard, are dismissed without prejudice. No other defendants remain and this case is stricken from the docket and closed. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this order to counsel of record and plaintiff at her last known address. ENTER: 2 August 8, 2019

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.