Hurley v. Colvin, No. 2:2014cv12131 - Document 19 (S.D.W. Va. 2015)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting and incorporating the 18 Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge; denying the plaintiff's 13 motion for judgment on the pleadings; granting the defendant's 14 motion for judgment on the pleadings; and affirming the decision of the Commissioner. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 7/13/2015. (cc: counsel of record; United States Magistrate Judge) (taq)

Download PDF
Hurley v. Colvin Doc. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON LORNA CARMEN HURLEY, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 2:14-12131 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The court having received the Proposed Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Dwane L. Tinsley, entered on February 27, 2015; and the magistrate judge having recommended that the court deny plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings; and the magistrate judge having further recommended that the court grant defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, affirm the final decision of the Commissioner, and dismiss this matter from the court’s docket; and no objection having been filed to the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, it is ORDERED that: 1. The findings made in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the magistrate judge be, and they hereby are, adopted by the court and incorporated herein; 2. The plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings Dockets.Justia.com be, and it hereby is, denied; 3. The defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings be, and it hereby is, granted; and 4. The decision of the Commissioner be, and it hereby is, affirmed. The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record and the United States Magistrate Judge. DATED: July 13, 2015 John T. Copenhaver, Jr. United States District Judge 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.