Hale v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., No. 2:2013cv33608 - Document 16 (S.D.W. Va. 2020)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 9/18/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (maw)

Download PDF
Hale v. Johnson & Johnson, et al. Doc. 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION KIMBERLY HALE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-33608 JOHNSON & JOHNSON, and ETHICON, INC., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On August 27, 2020, I entered an order directing plaintiff to show cause on or before September 10, 2020, why her case should not be dismissed without prejudice as to the remaining defendants pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has not shown cause. The court ORDERS that plaintiff’s case must be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to serve the remaining defendants within 90 days after the complaint was filed. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party. ENTER: September 18, 2020 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.