Cassell v. MedVenture Technology Corporation et al, No. 2:2013cv32598 - Document 134 (S.D.W. Va. 2020)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that MedVenture and BSC are dismissed without prejudice; no defendants remain; the Clerk is directed to dismiss this case and strike it from the active docket. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 12/11/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kew)

Download PDF
Cassell v. MedVenture Technology Corporation et al Doc. 134 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION GERRY CASSELL, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-032598 MEDVENTURE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. MEMORANADUM OPINION AND ORDER On November 10, 2020, I entered an order directing plaintiff Gerry Cassell to show cause on or before December 10, 2020, why her case should not be dismissed as to MedVenture Technology Corporation (“MedVenture”) and Boston Scientific Corporation (“BSC”) for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 41.1 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff Gerry Cassell has not responded to the Show Cause Order. The court ORDERS, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 41.1 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure and after weighing the factors identified in Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93, 95 (4th Cir. 1989), that MedVenture and BSC are dismissed without prejudice. No defendants remain, and the court DIRECTS the Clerk to dismiss the case and strike it from the active docket. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party. ENTER: December 11, 2020 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.