Mendoza et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al, No. 2:2013cv31570 - Document 44 (S.D.W. Va. 2020)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that the defendants are dismissed without prejudice; there are no remaining defendants in this case; this case is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the court's active docket; all pending motions are DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 11/23/2020. (cc: counsel of record; plaintiffs) (kew)

Download PDF
Mendoza et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al Doc. 44 Case 2:13-cv-31570 Document 44 Filed 11/23/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 669 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION Maricela Mendoza, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action Number 2:13-v-31570 Ethicon, Inc., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On October 21, 2020, I entered an order directing plaintiffs to show cause on or before November 20, 2020, why their case should not be dismissed as to the remaining defendants, Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 41.1 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. The Order was sent to the plaintiffs at their last known address and posted on the court’s website. Plaintiffs failed to respond to the Show Cause Order. Pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 41.1 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure and after weighing the factors identified in Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93, 95 (4th Cir. 1989), the court finds that the plaintiffs failed to prosecute their case. The court ORDERS that the above defendants are dismissed without prejudice. There are no remaining defendants in this case and, therefor, the court further ORDERS that the case is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the court’s active docket. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:13-cv-31570 Document 44 Filed 11/23/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 670 The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and plaintiffs at their address. ENTER: November 23, 2020

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.