Bernethy v. Sofradim Production SAS et al, No. 2:2013cv19843 - Document 30 (S.D.W. Va. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing this case be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 10/14/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kew)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Bernethy v. Sofradim Production SAS et al Doc. 30 Case 2:13-cv-19843 Document 30 Filed 10/14/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 382 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION TAMIE BERNETHY, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-19843 SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS and TISSUE SCIENCE LABORATORIES LIMITED, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On September 15, 2020, I entered an order directing plaintiff to show cause on or before September 30, 2020, why her case should not be dismissed without prejudice as to the remaining defendants, Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories, Limited, pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has not shown cause. The court ORDERS that plaintiff’s case must be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to serve the remaining defendant within 90 days after the complaint was filed. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party. ENTER: October 14, 2020 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
