Snyder et al v. Coloplast Corp., No. 2:2013cv16268 - Document 18 (S.D.W. Va. 2019)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The 15 MOTION by Coloplast Corp. to Dismiss With Prejudice is GRANTED in part to the extent Coloplast Corp. seeks dismissal and DENIED insofar as Coloplast Corp. seeks dismissal with prejudice. No additional defendants remain, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to dismiss and strike the case from the active docket. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 3/15/2019. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (mek)

Download PDF
Snyder et al v. Coloplast Corp. Doc. 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION KRISTEN RENEE SNYDER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-CV-16268 COLOPLAST CORP., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending is Defendant Coloplast Corp.’s Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, filed November 19, 2018. [ECF No. 15]. In the Motion, defendant Coloplast Corp. moves to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims against it with prejudice for failure to serve a plaintiff fact sheet. Plaintiffs have not responded. The court finds, pursuant to Rules 16 and 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and after weighing the factors identified in Wilson v. Volkswagen of Am., Inc., 561 F.2d 494, 503-06 (4th Cir. 1977), the plaintiffs’ claims against Coloplast Corp. should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to produce a completed plaintiff fact sheet in compliance with the court’s previous pretrial order. Therefore, the court ORDERS that the Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 15] is GRANTED in part to the extent Coloplast Corp. seeks dismissal and DENIED insofar as Coloplast Corp. seeks dismissal with prejudice. The court ORDERS that Coloplast Corp. is dismissed Dockets.Justia.com without prejudice. No additional defendants remain, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to dismiss and strike the case from the active docket. The court further DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party. ENTER: 2 March 15, 2019

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.