Sandoval v. Sofradim Production SAS et al, No. 2:2013cv11726 - Document 24 (S.D.W. Va. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that this case must be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to serve the remaining defendant within 90 days after the complaint was filed. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 11/3/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kew)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Sandoval v. Sofradim Production SAS et al Doc. 24 Case 2:13-cv-11726 Document 24 Filed 11/03/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 550 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION IGNACIA G. SANDOVAL, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-011726 SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS, et al., Defendants. MEM ORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On October 19, 2020, I entered an order directing plaintiff to show cause on or before November 2, 2020, why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice as to the remaining defendants, Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited, pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has not shown cause. The court ORDERS that this case must be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to serve the remaining defendants within 90 days after the complaint was filed. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party. ENTER: November 3, 2020 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
