Rosen et al v. Khetan, M.D. et al, No. 2:2012cv05068 - Document 34 (S.D.W. Va. 2019)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that the plaintiffs' case must be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to serve the remaining defendant within 90 days after the complaint was filed. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 10/16/2019. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (st)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Rosen et al v. Khetan, M.D. et al Doc. 34 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION ZOUKA ROSEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-cv-05068 UMAKANT M. KHETAN, M.D., Defendant. MEMORNADUM OPINION AND ORDER On July 15, 2019, I entered an order dismissing “Does 1-30” without prejudice and directing plaintiffs to show cause on or before August 5, 2019, why their case should not be dismissed without prejudice as to the remaining defendant, Umakant M. Khetan, pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs have not shown cause. The court ORDERS that plaintiffs’ case must be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to serve the remaining defendant within 90 days after the complaint was filed. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party. ENTER: October 16, 2019 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
