Pack et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation, No. 2:2010cv01343 - Document 23 (S.D.W. Va. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that plaintiffs' case must be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to serve the remaining defendant within 90 days after the complaint was filed. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 6/3/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (REF: MDL 2326; cases on Exhibit A) (maw)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Pack et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation Doc. 23 Case 2:10-cv-01343 Document 23 Filed 06/03/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1378 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION CAROL PACK and ALAN PACK, Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10-cv-01343 BOSTON SCIENTIFIC OCRPORATION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On May 6, 2020, I entered an order directing plaintiffs to show cause on or before May 20, 2020, why their case should not be dismissed without prejudice as to the remaining defendant, Boston Scientific Corporation, pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs have not shown cause. The court ORDERS that plaintiffs’ case must be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to serve the remaining defendant within 90 days after the complaint was filed. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party. ENTER: June 3, 2020 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
