Logan v. US District Court House et al, No. 2:2010cv01270 - Document 6 (S.D.W. Va. 2011)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 5 Proposed Findings and Recommendation; denying plaintiff's 4 Application to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs; and dismissing this action with prejudice. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 7/28/2011. (cc: pro se plaintiff; attys; United States Magistrate Judge) (taq)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON NINA AURORA J. LOGAN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 2:10-01270 US DISTRICT COURT HOUSE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, US COURT OF CLAIMS, and COUNTIES OF WV, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was previously referred to Mary E. Stanley, United States Magistrate Judge, who has submitted her Proposed Findings and Recommendation pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(B). The court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendation entered by the magistrate judge on June 24, 2011. The magistrate judge recommends dismissal of plaintiff s complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The magistrate judge further recommends that plaintiff s Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs be denied. The plaintiff has not objected to the Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The court concludes the recommended disposition is correct. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendation be, and it hereby is, adopted by the court; 2. Plaintiff s Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs be, and it hereby is, denied; and 3. This action be, and it hereby is, dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this written opinion and order to the pro se plaintiff, all counsel of record, and the United States Magistrate Judge. DATED: July 28, 2011 John T. Copenhaver, Jr. United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
