Redman v. Jackson County Prosecuting Attorney et al, No. 2:2010cv00119 - Document 9 (S.D.W. Va. 2010)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER agreeing with and adopting the thorough analysis of the Magistrate Judge's 7 Proposed Findings and Recommendation; the court DISMISSES this matter without prejudice under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 45 (1971). Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 3/11/2010. (cc: plaintiff; attys; any unrepresented party) (taq)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION CRANDALE REDMAN, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10-cv-00119 JACKSON COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER This action was referred to the Honorable Mary E. Stanley, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this court of proposed findings of fact and recommendations for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1) (2002). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that the presiding district court judge dismiss this matter without prejudice under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 45 (1971). The petitioner timely filed written objections to the Magistrate Judge s findings of fact and recommendation. Having reviewed the petitioner s objections de novo, the court FINDS that they ultimately are without merit. The court agrees with and adopts the thorough analysis of the Magistrate Judge. The court DISMISSES this matter without prejudice under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 45 (1971). The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party. ENTER: March 11, 2010
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
