United States of America v. O'Reilly, No. 2:2009cv00142 - Document 8 (S.D.W. Va. 2009)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that the exhibits submitted with Defendant's Answer shall be filed as a separate docket entry from the Answer itself, with access limited to court users, case participants, and the public terminal. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 4/16/2009. (cc: Defendant, attys) (mkw)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09-0142 PATRICK J. O REILLY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On April 15, 2009, the pro se Defendant herein filed his Answer to the Complaint. (Doc. No. 7.) Defendant included exhibits with his Answer that contain information which is protected pursuant to Rule 5.2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 5.2(e) authorizes the filing of documents electronically with limitations on nonparty remote access, upon court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(e). For good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the exhibits submitted with Defendant s Answer shall be filed as a separate docket entry from the Answer itself, with access limited to court users, case participants, and the public terminal. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to Defendant and counsel of record. It is SO ORDERED this 16th day of April, 2009. ENTER: David A. Faber Senior United States District Judge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
