Speed v. Thompson et al, No. 1:2021cv00486 - Document 10 (S.D.W. Va. 2022)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 8 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge, denying the 2 MOTION to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, dismissing plaintiff's 1 Complaint, and directing the Clerk to remove this case from the court's active docket. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 2/23/2022. (cc: plaintiff; counsel of record) (mk)

Download PDF
Speed v. Thompson et al Doc. 10 Case 1:21-cv-00486 Document 10 Filed 02/23/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD KASHIKA SPEED, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:21-00486 KEVIN THOMPSON, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER By Standing Order, this action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for submission of findings and recommendations regarding disposition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn submitted to the court his Findings and Recommendation (“PF&R”) on January 25, 2022, in which he recommended that the district court deny plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dismiss plaintiff’s complaint, and remove this matter from the court’s docket. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the parties were allotted fourteen days, plus three mailing days, in which to file any objections to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn’s Findings and Recommendation. The failure of any party to file such objections constitutes a waiver of such party's right to a de novo review by this court. Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363 (4th Cir. 1989). Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:21-cv-00486 Document 10 Filed 02/23/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 21 The parties failed to file any objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation within the required time period. Having reviewed the Findings and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn, the court adopts the findings and recommendations contained therein. Accordingly, the court hereby DENIES plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, DISMISSES plaintiff’s complaint, and directs the Clerk to remove this case from the court’s active docket. The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to plaintiff and counsel of record. IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of February, 2022. ENTER: David A. Faber Senior United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.