Washington v. Horton, No. 1:2020cv00038 - Document 4 (S.D.W. Va. 2022)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 3 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge; dismissing plaintiff's 1 Complaint without prejudice and directing the Clerk to remove this case from the court's active docket. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 11/1/2022. (cc: plaintiff, pro se and counsel of record) (arb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Washington v. Horton Doc. 4 Case 1:20-cv-00038 Document 4 Filed 11/01/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD DJUAN WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-00038 SIS OFFICER HORTON, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER By Standing Order, this action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for submission of findings and recommendation regarding disposition pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn submitted to the court his Findings and Recommendation on May 21, 2020, in which he recommended that the district court dismiss plaintiff’s Complaint without prejudice and remove this matter from the court’s docket. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b), the parties were allotted fourteen days, plus three mailing days, in which to file any objections to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn’s Findings and Recommendation. The failure of any party to file such objections constitutes a waiver of such party's right to a de novo review by this court. Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363 (4th Cir. 1989). The parties failed to file any objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation within the allotted time Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:20-cv-00038 Document 4 Filed 11/01/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 24 period. Having reviewed the Findings and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn, the court adopts the findings and recommendations contained therein. Accordingly, the court hereby DISMISSES plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice and directs the Clerk to remove this case from the court’s active docket. The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to plaintiff, pro se, and counsel of record. IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of November, 2022. ENTER: David A. Faber Senior United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
