Owens v. Saul, No. 1:2019cv00204 - Document 19 (S.D.W. Va. 2020)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 18 Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge Eifert as follows: Plaintiff's 15 motion for judgment on the pleadings, to the extent that it requests remand of the Commissioner's decision pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), is GRANTED; Defendant's 17 request to affirm the decision of the Commissioner is DENIED; The final decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED; This matter is REMANDED pursuant to sentence fo ur of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with this Order and the adopted PF&R; This action is DISMISSED with prejudice; and The Clerk is directed to remove this case from the court's active docket. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 8/18/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (mk)

Download PDF
Owens v. Saul Doc. 19 Case 1:19-cv-00204 Document 19 Filed 08/18/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 2527 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD ESTEL D. OWENS, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19-00204 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER By Standing Order, this action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for submission of findings and recommendation regarding disposition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Eifert submitted to the court her Findings and Recommendation on April 17, 2020, in which she recommended that the court grant plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, (ECF No. 15), to the extent that it requests remand of the Commissioner’s decision pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); deny defendant’s request to affirm the decision of the Commissioner, (ECF No. 17); reverse the final decision of the Commissioner; remand this matter pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with this PF&R; and dismiss this case, with prejudice, and remove it from the court’s active docket. (ECF No. 18.) Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:19-cv-00204 Document 19 Filed 08/18/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 2528 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the parties were allotted fourteen days and three mailing days in which to file any objections to Magistrate Judge Eifert’s Findings and Recommendation. The failure of any party to file such objections within the time allowed constitutes a waiver of such party’s right to a de novo review by this court. Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363 (4th Cir. 1989). Objections to the Proposed Findings and Recommendation were due by May 1, 2020. Neither party filed any objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, the court adopts the Finding and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Eifert as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, (ECF No. 15), to the extent that it requests remand of the Commissioner’s decision pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), is GRANTED; 2. Defendant’s request to affirm the decision of the Commissioner, (ECF No. 17), is DENIED; 3. The final decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED; 4. This matter is REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with this Order and the adopted PF&R; 5. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice; and 2 Case 1:19-cv-00204 Document 19 Filed 08/18/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 2529 6. The Clerk is directed to remove this case from the court’s active docket. The Clerk is further directed to forward a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to counsel of record and unrepresented parties. IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of August, 2020. ENTER: David A. Faber Senior United States District Judge 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.