Weems-Bey v. FCI McDowell et al, No. 1:2018cv01538 - Document 69 (S.D.W. Va. 2021)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 68 MOTION by Adrian Weems-Bey for Inquiry into the Court's Order for the Deduction of 20% of Any Income at FCI Gilmer re: 3 Order. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 10/20/2021. (cc: plaintiff; counsel of record) (mk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Weems-Bey v. FCI McDowell et al Doc. 69 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD ADRIAN WEEMS-BEY, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-01538 FCI MCDOWELL, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On July 13, 2021, this case was dismissed. Thereafter, on August 2, 2021, plaintiff filed a “Motion For inquiry into Court’s order for the deduction of 20% of my income at FCI-Gilmer.” No. 68. ECF According to plaintiff, he has been making payments on a previous lawsuit and “funds are constantly being taken.” Id. However, by letter dated July 13, 2021, the Clerk of Court informed plaintiff that no payments had been made on his behalf in either this case or in Civil Action No. 1:21-00069. 64. See ECF No. Therefore, plaintiff’s motion is DENIED.* The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to plaintiff, pro se, and counsel of record. IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of October, 2021. ENTER: David A. Faber Senior United States District Judge * In his motion, plaintiff states that he “isn’t making a complaint but requesting a proper inquiry.” ECF No. 68 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
