Sanders v. United States of America et al, No. 1:2017cv03950 - Document 6 (S.D.W. Va. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The court ADOPTS the 5 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn; DISMISSES Plaintiff's 1 Complaint and directs the Clerk to remove this case from the court's active docket. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 8/18/2020. (cc: counsel of record and any unrepresented parties) (arb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Sanders v. United States of America et al Doc. 6 Case 1:17-cv-03950 Document 6 Filed 08/18/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD CHRISTOPHER SANDERS, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-03950 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER By Standing Order, this action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for submission of findings and recommendation regarding disposition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn submitted to the court his Findings and Recommendation on May 19, 2020, in which he recommended that the court dismiss plaintiff’s Complaint, (ECF No. 1), and remove this matter from the court’s docket. (ECF No. 5.) In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the parties were allotted fourteen days and three mailing days in which to file any objections to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn’s Findings and Recommendation. The failure of any party to file such objections within the time allowed constitutes a waiver of such party’s right to a de novo review by this court. Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363 (4th Cir. 1989). Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:17-cv-03950 Document 6 Filed 08/18/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 29 Objections to the Proposed Findings and Recommendation were due by June 5, 2020. Neither party filed any objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, the court also adopts the Finding and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s Complaint, (ECF No. 1), is DISMISSED; and 2. The Clerk is directed to remove this case from the court’s active docket. The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to counsel of record and unrepresented parties. IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of August, 2020. ENTER: David A. Faber Senior United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
