Sanders v. Synchrony Bank, No. 1:2017cv02230 - Document 27 (S.D.W. Va. 2017)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting defendant's 10 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Set Aside Default, granting plaintiff's 21 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint, and directing the Clerk to enter the [21-1] Amended Complaint. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 9/27/2017. (cc: all counsel of record) (arb)

Download PDF
Sanders v. Synchrony Bank Doc. 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD JOSEPH M. SANDERS, III, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-02230 SYNCHRONY BANK, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the court is defendant’s “Unopposed Motion to Set Aside Default” (ECF No. 10) and plaintiff’s “Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint” (ECF No. 21). For the reasons that follow, plaintiff’s and defendant’s motions are GRANTED. I. Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Set Aside Default On May 18, 2017, Defendants filed a motion to set aside entry of default, originally entered on May 8, 2017. ECF No. 10. As noted in the motion, Rule 55(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits the setting aside of an entry of default for good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c); see also Rasmussen v. American Nat. Red Cross, 155 F.R.D. 549 (S.D.W. Va. 1994). Defendant alleges that good cause exists because plaintiff improperly served defendant and upon becoming aware of the Complaint, plaintiff and defendant informally stipulated to an extension of the responsive pleading deadline. See id. at ¶¶ 2-6. Dockets.Justia.com Additionally, the motion indicates that plaintiff does not oppose the motion. Id. For good cause shown, the court grants defendant’s motion. II. Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Complaint On August 25, 2017, plaintiff filed its “Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Complaint” accompanied by its First Amended ECF Nos. 21, 21-1. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 governs the amendment of pleadings. Rule 15(a)(1) provides a plaintiff with the opportunity to amend his or her Complaint once as a matter of course, subject to certain time limitations. Rule 15(a)(2), on the other hand, provides that “In all other cases, a party may amend its pleading only with the opposing party’s written consent or the court’s leave. The court should freely give leave in writing when justice so requires.” Counsel for defendant agreed proposed amendment on August 25, 2017. to plaintiff’s See ECF No. 22. In accordance with Rule 15(a)(2), the court grants plaintiff’s motion to amend. III. Conclusion Accordingly, the court GRANTS defendant’s Motion to Set Aside Default, GRANTS plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint, and DIRECTS the Clerk to enter the Amended Complaint, ECF No. 21-1. The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Memorandum Opinion to all counsel of record. It is SO ORDERED this 27th day of September 2017. ENTER: David A. Faber Senior United States District Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.