Loving v. Batts, No. 1:2010cv00195 - Document 20 (S.D.W. Va. 2011)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ADOPTS the 17 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge VanDervort; DENIES petitioner's 1 MOTION under 28 U.S.C. Section 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State or Federal Custody and DIRECTS the Clerk to remove this case from the court's docket. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 8/17/2011. (cc: Petitioner, pro se, and counsel of record) (mjp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BLUEFIELD DIVISION DEBORAH LOVING, Petitioner, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-0195 MYRON L. BATTS, Warden, FPC Alderson, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER By Standing Order, this action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort for submission of findings and recommendations regarding disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge VanDervort submitted to the court his Proposed Findings and Recommendation on October 26, 2010, in which he recommended that the district court deny petitioner s application under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State or Federal Custody, and remove this case from the court s docket. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the parties were allotted fourteen days, plus three mailing days, in which to file any objections to Magistrate Judge VanDervort s Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The failure of any party to file such objections constitutes a waiver of such party s right to a de novo review by this court. Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363 (4th Cir. 1989). The parties failed to file any objections to the Magistrate Judge s Proposed Findings and Recommendation within the seventeen-day period. Having reviewed the Proposed Findings and 1 Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge VanDervort, the court adopts the findings and recommendation contained therein. The court hereby DENIES petitioner s motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State or Federal Custody (Doc. # 1) and DIRECTS the Clerk to remove this case from the court s docket. The Clerk is further directed to forward a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to Petitioner, pro se, and counsel of record. It is SO ORDERED this 17th day of August, 2011. ENTER: David A. Faber Senior United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.