Kartman v. Markle et al, No. 5:2010cv00106 - Document 98 (N.D.W. Va. 2012)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING IN PART ANDDECLINING TO AFFIRM AND ADOPT IN PART 88 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE; GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT 59 MOTION AS TO DEFENDANTSSTANCOTI AND SKIDMORE; DENYING 25 MOTION TO DISMISS AS TO DEFENDANT MARKLE;DISMISSING DEFENDANTS LONG AND DOE AND ORDERING CASE TO PROCEED as to defendant Shannon Markle. The claims against Officer Long are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, The claims against John Doe Medical Employee are DISMIS SED WITH PREJUDICE. Court will enter a separate scheduling order. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 3/13/12. (c to pro se plaintiff by cert mail)(cc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/13/2012: # 1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (cc).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.