Townsend v. Gilmer County School Board of Education et al, No. 1:2021cv00130 - Document 18 (N.D.W. Va. 2021)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT ECF NO. 16 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael John Aloi on 10/15/21. (mh) (copy PS Plaintiff via cert mail) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/15/2021: # 1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (mh).

Download PDF
Townsend v. Gilmer County School Board of Education et al Doc. 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CLARKSBURG T.A.S., a minor, by and through his parent, Connie Townsend, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.): 1:21-CV-130 (JUDGE KEELEY) v. GILMER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF EDUCATION; PATRICIA LOWTHER, in her individual capacity and in her official capacity as Superintendent of Gilmer County Schools; and DOUG COTTRILL, DAVID RAMEZAN, TAMMY HUFFMAN, BRIAN KENNEDY, and THOMAS MINNEY, in their individual capacities and in their capacities as members of the Gilmer County Schools Board of Education, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT [ECF NO. 16] This matter has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to an Order entered by the presiding District Judge, Hon. Irene M. Keeley, dated October 4, 2021. [ECF No. 6]. By this motion, Plaintiff, pro se, seeks leave to file an amended complaint. However, by previous Order dated October 4, 2021, the Court directed Plaintiff to retain legal counsel or risk dismissal of the action. [ECF No. 7]. In this Order, the Court explained that Plaintiff, a minor, may not maintain such an action brought by and through his parent, Connie Townsend, who is not an 1 Dockets.Justia.com attorney. The Court directed that Plaintiff must retain legal counsel, and that such counsel must enter an appearance in this matter within 30 days of Plaintiff’s receipt of that Order. Plaintiff received the Order on October 8, 2021. [ECF No. 15]. Because Plaintiff may not maintain this action in its current posture, without retained counsel properly entering an appearance, Plaintiff also is not permitted to take measures to litigate this matter prior to such counsel appearing. Thus, Plaintiff may not seek relief by the presentlypending motion. Only if Plaintiff retains counsel who properly enters an appearance will the Court entertain such a motion. Accordingly, based on the foregoing, Plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint [ECF No. 16] is hereby DENIED. It is so ORDERED. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to all pro se parties by certified mail, return receipt requested, to their last known addresses as shown on the docket, to counsel of record by electronic means. DATED: October 15, 2021. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.