Pajak v. Under Armour, Inc. et al, No. 1:2019cv00160 - Document 206 (N.D.W. Va. 2021)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS UNDER ARMOUR, INC. AND UNDER ARMOUR RETAIL, INC.S MOTION TO MODIFY THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM ECF NO. 189 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael John Aloi on 1/15/21. (mh)

Download PDF
Pajak v. Under Armour, Inc. et al Doc. 206 Case 1:19-cv-00160-IMK-MJA Document 206 Filed 01/15/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1786 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CLARKSBURG CYNTHIA D. PAJAK, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:19-CV-160 (JUDGE KEELEY) UNDER ARMOUR, INC., UNDER ARMOUR RETAIL, INC., AND BRIAN BOUCHER, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS UNDER ARMOUR, INC. AND UNDER ARMOUR RETAIL, INC.’S MOTION TO MODIFY THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM [ECF NO. 189] This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to a Referral Order [ECF No. 194] entered by Honorable Senior United States District Judge Irene M. Keeley on January 8, 2021. By this Referral Order, Judge Keeley referred Defendants Under Armour, Inc. and Under Armour Retail, Inc.’s Motion to Modify Third-Party Subpoena Duces Tecum [ECF No. 189] to the undersigned for a hearing and disposition. The undersigned also is in receipt of Plaintiff’s response [ECF No. 201], thereto, filed on January 13, 2021. At a hearing before the undersigned on January 14, 2021, counsel for Plaintiff and Under Armour indicated that they had reached a resolution of the issues raised in Under Armour’s motion. Accordingly, based on the foregoing, Under Armour’s motion [ECF No. 189] is DENIED as moot. It is so ORDERED. The Court directs the Clerk of the Court to provide a copy of this Order to any parties who appear pro se and all counsel of record, as provided in the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing in the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia. 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:19-cv-00160-IMK-MJA Document 206 Filed 01/15/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1787 DATED: January 15, 2021. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.