Arrick v. United States, No. 1:2017cv00131 - Document 106 (N.D.W. Va. 2020)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [ECF NO. 91 ], OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS [ECF NO. 99 ], AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION [ECF NO. 58 ]. The pending motion for an extension oftime to respond to the Defenda nts' reply [ECF No. 90 ] is DENIED, given that surreplies are not permitted under Rule 11(d) of the Local Rules of Prisoner Litigation Procedure. The Court also DENIES Plaintiff's motion for an extension at ECF No. 105 . The Complaint is DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Thomas S. Kleeh on 3/26/2020. (Copy to PS plaintiff via CM, RRR.)(wrr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/26/2020: # 1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (wrr).

Download PDF
Arrick v. United States Doc. 106 Att. 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.