Hagos v. King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office et al, No. 2:2022cv01725 - Document 9 (W.D. Wash. 2023)

Court Description: ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint, and instead on May 16, 2023, filed a pleading entitled Objection Order and Findings and Recommendation. Dkt. 8. Even construing this objection in the broadest manner, the Court finds no basis to conclude it constitutes the amended complaint that Plaintiff was ordered to file no later than January 27, 2023. The Court accordingly DISMISSES the present complaint without prejudice. (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) (CR)

Download PDF
Hagos v. King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office et al Doc. 9 Case 2:22-cv-01725-MJP-BAT Document 9 Filed 05/17/23 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 DANIEL TEKLEMARIAM HAGOS , Plaintiff, 9 10 11 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. KING COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, et al., 12 13 CASE NO. 2:22-cv-01725-MJP Defendants. On January 5, 2023, the Court issued an Order dismissing with prejudice Counts I and II of Plaintiff’s complaint and Defendants King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office, King County Correctional Facility, Jail Health Service, E. Bradford Bales and Classifications Officer. Dkt. 7. The Court granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint limited to the Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Gonzalez and Driscoll that were contained in Count III. The Court further directed that any amended complaint must be filed within 21 days of the matter will be dismissed. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint, and instead on May 16, 2023, filed a pleading entitled “Objection Order and Findings and Recommendation. Dkt. 8. Even construing this objection in the broadest manner, the Court finds no basis to conclude it constitutes the amended complaint that Plaintiff was ordered to file no later than January 27, 2023. The Court ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:22-cv-01725-MJP-BAT Document 9 Filed 05/17/23 Page 2 of 2 1 accordingly DISMISSES the present complaint without prejudice. 2 The Clerk shall provide Plaintiff a copy of this Order and close the matter. 3 DATED this 17th day of May, 2023. 5 A 6 MARSHA J. PECHMAN United States Senior District Judge 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.