Walsh v. Gutters Perfect Inc et al, No. 2:2021cv00635 - Document 10 (W.D. Wash. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER granting Plaintiff's 9 Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendants. Defendants violated 29 U.S.C. §§ 1104(a)(1)(A), 1104(a)(1)(B) and 1105(a)(1)-(3) of Title I of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1191c. AMI Benefit Plan A dministrators, Inc. is hereby appointed as independent fiduciary with discretionary authority over the administration and management of the Plan. This Court retains jurisdiction of this action for purposes of enforcing compliance with the terms of this Order and Judgment. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Walsh v. Gutters Perfect Inc et al Doc. 10 Case 2:21-cv-00635-RSM Document 10 Filed 01/12/22 Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 SUSAN KUMLI Acting Regional Solicitor LAURA C. BREMER (Cal. Bar No. 162900) Counsel for ERISA NATASHA MAGNESS (Wa. Bar No. 55920) Trial Attorney UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 90 7th Street, Suite 3-700 San Francisco, CA 94103-1516 Email: Magness.natasha.a@dol.gov Telephone: 206-757-6757 Attorneys for Plaintiff Martin J. Walsh, United States Secretary of Labor 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 The Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez MARTIN J. WALSH, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, v. Plaintiff, Case No. 2:21-cv-00635-RSM ORDER GRANTING SECRETARY’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS GUTTERS PERFECT INC., dba LEAF FILTER, a Washington corporation, and GUTTERS PERFECT, INC. 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN, a Safe Harbor Defined Contribution Plan Defendants. 21 22 23 The United States Secretary of Labor (the “Secretary”) brought this action 24 requesting that the Court appoint an independent fiduciary to act as a fiduciary for 25 Gutters Perfect, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (“Plan”) pursuant to the Employee 26 Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1191c, and to 27 obtain other equitable relief to redress violations and enforce the provisions of ERISA 28 ORDER GRANTING SECRETARY’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT – PAGE 1 (2:21-cv-00635-RSM) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR 90 7th Street, Suite 3-700 San Francisco, CA 94103-1516 (206) 757-6757 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:21-cv-00635-RSM Document 10 Filed 01/12/22 Page 2 of 6 1 pursuant to Section 502(a)(2) and (5), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(2) and (5). The Secretary now 2 brings a motion for entry of a default judgment against Defendants Gutters Perfect Inc., 3 (“Gutters Perfect”) and the Plan (together “Defendants”) under Rule 55(b)(2) of the 4 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, seeking a judgment appointing an independent 5 fiduciary to perform various duties, including distribution of Plan participant’s retirement 6 savings from the Plan. 7 8 9 10 Following entry of default, courts are authorized to grant default judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55. In exercising its discretion, the factors the court may consider include: (1) the possibility of prejudice to the plaintiff, (2) the merits of 11 plaintiff’s substantive claim, (3) the sufficiency of the complaint, (4) the sum of money at 12 stake in the action, (5) the possibility of a dispute concerning material facts, (6) whether 13 the default was due to excusable neglect, and (7) the strong public policy underlying the 14 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure favoring decisions on the merits. Eitel v. McCool, 782 15 F.2d 1470, 1471–72 (9th Cir. 1986). In considering these factors, all factual allegations in 16 the plaintiff’s complaint are taken as true, except for those relating to damages. TeleVideo 17 Sys., Inc. v. Heidenthal, 826 F.2d 915, 917–918 (9th Cir. 1987). After having considered 18 the documents filed in support of the motion, the Complaint, the file in this action, and all 19 other matters presented to the Court, including the discussion of the factors set forth in 20 Eitel, 782 F.2d at 1471–72, the Court finds as follows: 21 22 23 24 25 26 1. Gutters Perfect was dissolved by the State of Washington in March 2013. 2. Jack Mitchell Reed, the Plan’s sole trustee, is deceased, and as such is not available to perform his duties as trustee such as authorizing the Plan’s asset custodian, Charles Schwab and Co., Inc., to distribute plan assets to Plan participants and beneficiaries. 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SECRETARY’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT – PAGE 2 (2:21-cv-00635-RSM) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR 90 7th Street, Suite 3-700 San Francisco, CA 94103-1516 (206) 757-6757 Case 2:21-cv-00635-RSM Document 10 Filed 01/12/22 Page 3 of 6 1 2 3 3. Default was entered by the Clerk of the Court against Defendants on September 13, 2021. 4. Defendants did not appear or otherwise defend in this action after the Secretary 4 served the Washington Secretary of State a copy of the summons and 5 complaint in this action in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6 4(e)(1) and 4(h)(1)(A), and Revised Code of Washington 23.95.450(4). 7 5. Absent entry of default judgment against Defendants and appointment of an 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 independent fiduciary, the Secretary and Plan participants and beneficiaries would be prejudiced because the Plan’s asset custodian has custody of the Plan assets (Plan participants’ retirement savings) and refuses to distribute the Plan assets without authorization of the Plan’s sole trustee, who is deceased. 6. The Secretary has alleged sufficient facts in his complaint, which the Court must accept as true for purposes of establishing liability, to show that Gutters Perfect violated ERISA. In particular, Gutters Perfect failed to determine and pay benefits under the Plan, resulting in participants’ and beneficiaries’ inability to access plan assets and Gutters Perfect failed to act with the care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing that a 19 prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters would 20 use in the conduct of an enterprise of a like character and with like aims as 21 required by 29 U.S.C. § 1104(a)(1)(B). 22 7. The Secretary does not seek a money judgment against Defendants. 23 8. There is no possibility of a dispute regarding the material facts alleged by the 24 Secretary. Governmental websites corroborate some of the Secretary’s 25 allegations such as Gutters Perfect’s status as a dissolved entity and the death 26 of sole trustee Jack Mitchell Reed in October 2019. 27 28 ORDER GRANTING SECRETARY’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT – PAGE 3 (2:21-cv-00635-RSM) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR 90 7th Street, Suite 3-700 San Francisco, CA 94103-1516 (206) 757-6757 Case 2:21-cv-00635-RSM Document 10 Filed 01/12/22 Page 4 of 6 1 9. Default was not due to excusable neglect. The Secretary properly served 2 Defendants by way of the Washington Secretary of State and did not receive 3 any Response from Defendants. Publicly available documents show that the 4 company is no longer in operation, which supports a finding that default was 5 not the result of excusable neglect. 6 10. While public policy generally favors resolution of complaints on the merits, 7 this policy is not absolute and must be weighed against other equities such as 8 prejudice to the plaintiff. 9 10 THEREFORE, IT IS ADJUDGED AND ORDERED that: 11 12 13 14 1. Defendants violated 29 U.S.C. §§ 1104(a)(1)(A), 1104(a)(1)(B) and 1105(a)(1)-(3) of Title I of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1191c. 2. AMI Benefit Plan Administrators, Inc. is hereby appointed as independent 15 fiduciary with discretionary authority over the administration and management of 16 the Plan, with all the rights, duties, discretion, and responsibilities of a trustee, 17 fiduciary, and Plan Administrator under ERISA to perform the following duties: 18 a. The independent fiduciary shall be responsible for marshaling, calculating 19 the account balances, allocating, paying out, distributing, and administering 20 Plan assets for all the assets in the Plan, and taking further action with 21 respect to the Plan as appropriate, and terminating the Plan when all of its 22 assets are distributed to all of the eligible Plan participants and 23 beneficiaries; 24 25 26 b. The independent fiduciary shall, pursuant to the procedures outlined in the Employee Benefits Security Administration’s (“EBSA”) Field Assistance Bulletin No. 2014-01, exercise reasonable care and diligence to identify and 27 28 ORDER GRANTING SECRETARY’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT – PAGE 4 (2:21-cv-00635-RSM) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR 90 7th Street, Suite 3-700 San Francisco, CA 94103-1516 (206) 757-6757 Case 2:21-cv-00635-RSM Document 10 Filed 01/12/22 Page 5 of 6 1 locate each participant and beneficiary of the Plan who is eligible to receive 2 a distribution under the terms of the Plan; 3 c. The independent fiduciary shall have full access to all data, information, 4 and calculations in the possession of the Plan and under its control, 5 including information and records maintained by the Defendants, their 6 attorneys, their accountants, and other agents, as well as service providers 7 of the Plan; 8 d. The independent fiduciary shall comply with all applicable rules and laws; 9 e. The independent fiduciary has all the rights, duties, discretion and 10 responsibilities of a trustee, fiduciary and Plan Administrator under ERISA, 11 including filing annual and/or final Form 5500; 12 f. For services performed pursuant to this judgment, the independent fiduciary 13 shall receive compensation not to exceed $3,810.00 for fees and expenses 14 reasonably and necessarily incurred in administrating and terminating the 15 Plan; and 16 g. The independent fiduciary’s fees and expenses shall be paid from the assets 17 of the Plan, or alternatively by the Secretary out of EBSA’s Abandoned 18 19 Plan Fund, which was established to defray the expenses of the 20 administration and termination of low asset abandoned plans. 21 // 22 // 23 24 25 // // 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING SECRETARY’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT – PAGE 5 (2:21-cv-00635-RSM) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR 90 7th Street, Suite 3-700 San Francisco, CA 94103-1516 (206) 757-6757 Case 2:21-cv-00635-RSM Document 10 Filed 01/12/22 Page 6 of 6 1 2 3. This Court retains jurisdiction of this action for purposes of enforcing compliance with the terms of this Order and Judgment. 3 4 5 6 DATED this 12th day of January, 2022. 7 8 A 9 10 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Presented by: SEEMA NANDA Solicitor of Labor SUSAN G. KUMLI Acting Regional Solicitor LAURA C. BREMER Counsel for ERISA /s/Natasha Magness NATASHA MAGNESS U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor Trial Attorney 23 24 Attorneys for the Plaintiff Secretary of Labor 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING SECRETARY’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT – PAGE 6 (2:21-cv-00635-RSM) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR 90 7th Street, Suite 3-700 San Francisco, CA 94103-1516 (206) 757-6757
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
