John Gabor et al v. Rebecca Harris et.al., No. 2:2018cv00312 - Document 219 (E.D. Wash. 2022)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT entered in favor of Plaintiffs John and Kay Gabor and against Defendants Kristin Humphrey and Rebecca Harris. (BF, Paralegal)

Download PDF
John Gabor et al v. Rebecca Harris et.al. Doc. 219 Case 2:18-cv-00312-TOR ECF No. 219 filed 02/10/22 PageID.2619 Page 1 of 1 AO 450 (Rev. 11/11) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for thH_ Eastern District of Washington JOHN GABOR and KAY GABOR, Plaintiff v. ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-0312-TOR REBECCA HARRIS and KRISTIN HUMPHREY, Defendant JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): u the plaintiff (name) defendant (name) recover from the the amount of ), which includes prejudgment % per annum, along with costs. dollars ($ %, plus post judgment interest at the rate of interest at the rate of u the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . u other: Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Counts I-VIII of the First Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' remaining claims are DISMISSED. Plaintiffs are awarded $1,152,491.64 in prejudgment interest, payable by Defendants Rebecca Harris and Kristin Humphrey, jointly and severally. Upon entry of this final judgment, interest will accrue on the sum of Defendants’ unpaid balance ($149,662.87 deficiency amount and $1,152,491.64 prejudgment interest), at a rate of 0.08% per annum. This action was (check one): u tried by a jury with Judge rendered a verdict. u tried by Judge was reached. u decided by Judge presiding, and the jury has without a jury and the above decision THOMAS O. RICE on Plaintiffs' Motion for Prejudgment Interest (ECF No. 212) and Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Counts I-VIII of the First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 211). Date: February 10, 2022 CLERK OF COURT SEAN F. McAVOY s/ B. Fortenberry %\ Deputy Clerk B. Fortenberry Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.