Snead v. Selam, VA et al, No. 7:2022cv00138 - Document 9 (W.D. Va. 2022)
Court Description: OPINION. Signed by Senior Judge James P. Jones on 5/4/2022. (Opinion mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Snead v. Selam, VA et al Case 7:22-cv-00138-JPJ-PMS Document 9 Filed 05/04/22 Page 1 of 2 Pageid#: 27 Doc. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION CEDRIC OMAR SNEAD, Plaintiff, v. SELAM, VIRGINIA, ET AL., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 7:22CV00138 OPINION JUDGE JAMES P. JONES Cedric Omar Snead, Pro Se Plaintiff. Plaintiff, Cedric Omar Snead, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in March of 2022. He was granted the opportunity to proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that he could pay the $350.00 filing fee via installments from an inmate trust account, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). On March 23, 2022, the court received plaintiff’s notice of address change that indicates he has been released from custody. If so, plaintiff would no longer be subject to the provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, which allowed him to pay the $350.00 filing fee via installments. An Order entered on March 24, 2022, directed Snead to submit, within ten days from that date, the filing fee owed and the applicable administrative fee, a total of $400, or to otherwise respond to the court. The Order advised that a failure to Dockets.Justia.com Case 7:22-cv-00138-JPJ-PMS Document 9 Filed 05/04/22 Page 2 of 2 Pageid#: 28 comply within the time limits set out in the order would result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. The deadline the court set for Snead’s response has passed, and he has had no further communication with the court. Therefore, I will dismiss the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. A separate final order will be entered herewith. ENTER: May 4, 2022 /s/ JAMES P. JONES Senior United States District Judge -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
