Stricklin v. Davis, No. 7:2021cv00625 - Document 23 (W.D. Va. 2022)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 5/10/2022. (Opinion mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab) (Main Document 23 replaced on 5/10/2022) (aab). Modified on 5/10/2022, deleted order attached to memo (aab).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Stricklin v. Davis Case 7:21-cv-00625-RSB Document 23 Filed 05/10/22 Page 1 of 1 Pageid#: 126 Doc. 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION PAUL ARTHUR STRICKLIN, Plaintiff, v. CRYSTAL DAVIS, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 7:21cv00625 MEMORANDUM OPINION By: Robert S. Ballou United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Paul Arthur Stricklin, a former inmate proceeding pro se, filed this civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. After filing this action, Stricklin advised the court that he had been released from incarceration. (See ECF No. 18.) By order entered April 21, 2022, the court advised Stricklin that because he was no longer an inmate, he would not be allowed to pay the filing fee in installments under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. (See ECF No. 19.) The court ordered Stricklin to pay the balance of the filing fee or otherwise respond to the order within ten days. (Id.) The court warned Stricklin that failure to pay the filing fee or otherwise respond to the order would result in immediate dismissal of the action without prejudice. (Id.) Stricklin did not respond to the court’s order. Accordingly, the court will dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to comply. Enter: May 10, 2022 /s/ Robert S. Ballou Robert S. Ballou United States Magistrate Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
