Potter v. Haysi Regional Jail, No. 7:2020cv00301 - Document 10 (W.D. Va. 2020)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Senior Judge Glen E. Conrad on 6/26/2020. (ck)

Download PDF
Potter v. Haysi Regional Jail Case 7:20-cv-00301-GEC-PMS Document 10 Filed 06/26/20 Page 1 of 2 Pageid#: 47 Doc. 10 cœ Rx'sOFFICEus.DlsT.cœ r ATo N6u ,va FILED JUN 2 6 2222 JUL IN TM UN TED STATESDISTRICT COURT BY; FOR TIIE W ESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGIN A R OA NO K E D IW SIO N ANTHONY RYANPOTTER, UDLEK CLERK D P CASENO.7:20CV00301 Plaintiff, V. m M ORANDUM OPN QN HAYSIREGIONAL JM L, By: H on.Glen E.Conrad SeniorUnited StatesDistrictJudge D efendant. Plainfs Anthony Ryan Pottet,a vuzlwa zmuam Ixuuuuuius uro K ,sledthiscivildghts . action pursltrmtto 42 U.S.C.j1983 agnl -nstthe ççHaysiRegigoqnalJai1,''alleging thathewas beingwrongfully keptin <tmax''and shotlld be'releued. Compl.1,2,ECF No.1. Aûerreview ofthemgord,thecourtconcludesthatthiscivilaction mustbesllmmarily dismissed, The courtisiequired to dismiss any action sled by a prisoner againsta governm ental entity orbfscerifthe courtdetermbnesthatthe.action isfdvolous,m alicious,orfailsto state a . clàim on wllich reliefmc be granted. 28 U.S.C.j 1915A(b)(1). Section 1983 parmitsan . : ' aggrieved party to ;le a civilaction againsta person for qctionstaken under colorofstatelaw thatviolatedhisconstimtionaldghts.Cooperv.Sheeham 735F.3d 153,158(4thCir.2013).A complm'ntmustbe dismissed ifitdoesnotallege N nougb factsto state a claim to reliefthatis plausibleonitsface.''BellAtl.Coo .v.Twombly.550U.S.544,570(200X. Potteridentifeso2ly one defendant: the HaysiAqgionalJail. A localjail,however, cnnnotqualifyasapersonsubjecttobeingsuedx underj1983: See.e.q.,Mùcoyv.Chésapeake '' , . Com Ck.,788F.Supp.890,893-94 (E.D.Va,1992). BecausePotter'sj1983clslmsMnnot proceed againstthe only defendanthe hasnmnedkthe courtwillsllmm arily dismiss tlze action Dockets.Justia.com Case 7:20-cv-00301-GEC-PMS Document 10 Filed 06/26/20 Page 2 of 2 Pageid#: 48 without prejudice tmder j1915A(b)(1).1 An appropriate order willenterthis day. Such a dismissalleavesPotterfreeto refilehisclaimsin anew and separatecivilaction ifhe can correct the defcienciesdescribed in tllisopinion.He isadvised,however,thataprisonerm ay notbring a civil action without complete prepayment of the appropdate filing fee and a $50.00 administrative fee,ifthe pdsonerhasbroughton three ormoreoccasions,an action orappealin afederalcourtthatwasdismissed asfdvolous,asmalicious,orforfailm eto statea claim upon which reliefm ay be granted,lmlesstheprisoherisin imminentdangerofsedousphysicalinjury. . See28U.S.C.j1915(g). The Clerk is directed to send copies ofthis m em orandum opinion and accom panying orderto plaintiff. ENTER :Tllis M day ofJune, 2020. SerliörUn'ed StatesDistdctJudge 1 M oreover, Pott er'ssubmissionsdonotpresentfactsstating any actionablej1983claim againstanyone. Hiscomplaintcentersonhissecurityclassitkationandthem' eaofthejailwhereheisconfmed.Asrelietheseeks tobehousedinamedium securityunitatadifferentjail.However,inmateshavenoconstimtionallyprotectedright to behoused atanyparticularjailortobeclassified toany pm icularsecurity levelwithin ajail. SeeHewittv. Helms,459U.S.460,468 (1983)(findingthatprisonerhasnorecor ized liberty interestinaparticularsecmity classitkationorprisonglacement);Meachum v.Fano,427U.S.215,223-224(1976)(findingthatinmateshadno liberty interest in avoidmg transfer from medium to maximllm sectlrity prison or in being transferred only after proven,seriousmisconduct). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.