Livingston v. Roberts et al, No. 7:2020cv00254 - Document 10 (W.D. Va. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 8/24/2020. (Opinion mailed to Pro Se Parties via US Mail)(slt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Livingston v. Roberts et al Case 7:20-cv-00254-MFU-RSB Document 10 Filed 08/25/20 Page 1 of 1 Pageid#: 97 Doc. 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION JOHNTAE REMONTZ LIVINGSTON, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) M. ROBERTS, et al., ) Defendants. ) Civil Action No. 7:20cv00254 MEMORANDUM OPINION By: Michael F. Urbanski Chief United States District Judge Plaintiff Johntae Remontz Livingston, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se and not in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By notice entered April 30, 2020, the court advised Livingston that he must notify the court by no later than July 31, 2020 that he had accomplished service on the defendants. See ECF No. 4. On August 3, 2020, because Livingston has not notified the court concerning service, the court directed him to show cause within fourteen days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See ECF No. 9. The court warned Livingston that failure to respond to the court’s order order would result in dismissal of this action. Id. Livingston did not respond. Therefore, the court will dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. 24th day of August, 2020. ENTER: This ____ Michael F. Urbanski Chief U.S. District Judge 2020.08.24 18:48:26 -04'00' ____________________________________ Michael F. Urbanski Chief United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
