Crawley v. Mabe et al, No. 7:2019cv00613 - Document 12 (W.D. Va. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 5/27/2020. (Opinion mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Crawley v. Mabe et al Case 7:19-cv-00613-MFU-RSB Document 12 Filed 05/27/20 Page 1 of 1 Pageid#: 33 Doc. 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION DAVID CRAWLEY, Plaintiff, v. JUDGE GERALD MABE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 7:19cv00613 MEMORANDUM OPINION By: Michael F. Urbanski Chief United States District Judge Plaintiff David Crawley, a former inmate proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. After filing this action, Crawley advised the court that he had been released from incarceration. See ECF No. 10. By order entered May 7, 2020, the court advised Crawley that because he was no longer an inmate, he would not be allowed to pay the filing fee in installments under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. See ECF No. 11. The court ordered Crawley to pay the balance of the filing fee or otherwise respond to the order within ten days. Id. The court warned Crawley that failure to pay the filing fee or otherwise respond to the order would result in immediate dismissal of the action without prejudice. Id. Crawley did not respond to the court’s order. Accordingly, the court will dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to comply. The court notes that this dismissal is without prejudice to Crawley’s opportunity to refile his claims in a separate civil action, subject to the applicable statute of limitations. 27thday of May, 2020. ENTER: This ____ Digitally signed by Michael F. Urbanski DN: cn=Michael F. Urbanski, o=Western District of Virginia, ou=United States District Court, email=mikeu@vawd.uscourts.gov, c=US Date: 2020.05.27 10:14:11 -04'00' ____________________________________ Michael F. Urbanski Chief United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
