Brownfield v. Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women et al, No. 7:2018cv00236 - Document 17 (W.D. Va. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 11/2/18. (sas)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Brownfield v. Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women et al Doc. 17 CLERK'S OFFICE U.S. DIST. COURT AT ROANOKE, VA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION FILED NOV 05 2018 Civil Action No. 7:18-cv-00236 PRINCESS BROWNFIELD, Plaintiff, ERK MEMORANDUM OPINION v. By: Michael F. Urbanski FLUVANNA CORRECTIONAL CENTER FOR WOMEN, et al, Chief United States District Judge Defendant(s), Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. By Order entered 9/27/2018, the court directed plaintiff to submit within 10 days from the date of the Order the full filing fee or otherwise respond because it had come to the attention of the court that plaintiff was no longer an inmate, and no longer subject to the provisoin ofthe Prisoner Litigation Reform Act. Plaintiff was advised that a failure to comply would result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. More than 10 days have elapsed, and plaintiff has failed to comply with the described conditions. Accordingly, the court dismisses the action without prejudice and strikes the case from the active docket of the court. Plaintiff may refile the claims in a separate action once plaintiff is prepared to comply with the noted conditions. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and accompanying Order to plaintiff. ENTER: ,_,_ 1/ Chief 1 ..States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
