Tower v. New River Valley Regional Jail, No. 7:2018cv00178 - Document 6 (W.D. Va. 2018)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Senior Judge Glen E. Conrad on 5/11/2018. (slt)

Download PDF
I TH E UN I N TED STA TES D I STR I T C O UR T C FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI NI CT RGI A R O A N O K E D I SI N W O TA YL O R N A TH AM EL TO W ER , CLERK' OFFI U. DI O UR' S CE B. SX I AT ROANOKE, VA FI LED MA II2 1 t 98 CA SE N O .7: V001 18C 78 î . LEX CLPRK D : . CLERK Pl nt f , ai i f M EM O R AN DU M O PI NION NEW RW ER VALLEY REGI ONAL JA I L, By: H on.G l n E .C o e nrad Se or U ni e St e D i t i tJudge ni t d at s s r c D efendant . Ta orNahale To r aVigilai t pr e di pr K , ied t sci lr g s a ton yl t ril we , r ri nma e oc e ng o f l hi vi i ht c i . u d r4 U. C.j1 8 a an tt Ne Ri rValy Re in lJ i (t ej i'. To ralg s n e 2 S. 9 3 g is he w ve l e go a al Gh a1) we le e t ' t t he i no beng s ha s t i hown t 1b t s r s t r l e t hi G - p C' a i r c vi no he a e t e uls ' atd o s ll e le ' nd s e ei ng te t n ' ei b igd ne g iva c f r a d I u p o e s'a d h i s b e tt K nlla d rame t h s en e id re n e o ms n f e r c s' n e s u j c o K e n , d ; c un s l t s me t i t ep o e tv c so y(TC' u i wh r h i h u e , e h sc oc f r u ua pmih n' n h r tcie u t d ç ' nt e e e s o s d p r i h ie o ' ) 3 s ey r s . c omp1 2- ,ECF N o. af t ea ons1 A s r i f Tow e s ks m one m' da ag . Af e ele , r ee t y m es tx r vi of t co pl nt t c t c l s t t Towe ' cvi aci mus be s ma iy e ew he m ai , he our onc ude ha rs i l ton t um rl ds se wi u p eudc . imis d t t rj ie ho Und r4 U. C.j 1 9 ec () t ec u t y ds s a y j 1 8 a to l t r s e t o e 2 S. 9 7 ()1, h o r ma imis n 9 3 cin i h e p c t wi prs n c tons...i t cour i s tsid t t a ton i fi ous malci ,( jfist io ondii f he t s aife hat he ci s rvol , i ous or al o sae a cli upo whih r le c n be g a ed.' A ç rvol us'c am i one t t Gl ks aï tt am n c ei f a r nt ' G i o ' li s f ha çac r ag a l ba i ete i 1w o i fc ' Netkev.W i ims 4 0 U. 31 ,3 5 3 7 ( 98 ) r u b e ss i r n a r n a t' i h z l a , 9 S. 9 2 , 2 1 9 l Tower v. New River Valley Regional Jail Doc. 6 (ntr etngGrvol 'i f me vesonof28U. C.j1 5( ) i epr i û i ous'n or r ri f S. 91 d). Seci 1 3 pe t a a i ve pa t t fl aci laci p a i tape s n f a tons ton 98 nnis n ggre d ry o ie vi to gans r o or c i t ke t de col of sa e 1 w t tvi a e hi c tm to lr ght Se Coope v.She ha 735 a n m r or t t a ha ol t d s ons i i na i s. e r e n, 1 SPecii aly, Toweralegest he ca onl l fc l l hat n y eave hi PC cel f one hourperday,has lmie s l or i td acces t a t e s o el phone a no ac s t a t e si a has not been out i f r ea i even once nd ces o elvi on, nd sde or ecr ton snceD ec ber6,2017.He alo alegest ot PC i a eshavem or prviegest n hehas i em s l hat her nm t e il ha . Dockets.Justia.com F.d 1 3 1 8 (t Ci. 3 . Th o l e tt ta To rn me a a d fn a tt hi j 1 8 3 5 , 5 4h r 201 ) e ny n iy h t we n s s ee d n o s 9 3 camsi t ej i is l.Rhej i, we r i n tat ro ' u j c t s t n e j1 3.M c y li s h altef n alho ve, s o t s n's b e t o uiu d r 98 pe co v Ch spe k Cor Ce tr 7 8F. u p. 9 8 -4( D. . 9 2 . . e a a e r. n e, 8 S p 8 0, 93 9 E. Va 1 9 ) Be us To ' c antprs nt no l albassfracam acina eunde j1983 ca e wers ompli e e s eg i o li to bl r a ns t onl de e nthe ha nn e t c u' wilsl rl dim is t s a ton wihout gai t he y f nda s m d, he ot t l lmma iy s s hi c i t p eudc un e j1 9 e c( )a fio o .Ana p o raeo d rwi e trti da . rj ie d r 9 7 ()1 s rv lus p r p it r e l n e h s y l ENTER;Thi ll s da ofM a 201 y y, 8. Se orUnie Stt Diti tJ ni td aes src udge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.