Jones v. Jones, No. 7:2018cv00168 - Document 11 (W.D. Va. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Senior Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 7/31/2018. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CL RKBOS I US DYY C E FCE OQX A n N IL ,A T A VI iV I FI LED I vw o l s x vso vxvssox cvcosuv svm ' ' , 3, s uu a . FOR TH E W ESTERN DI STRI OF W RGI A CT NI ROAN OKE DI SI VI ON J uu w. u , cL : ysx DEP DEM OND LAW ARANCE J ONES, Pli tf, a n if v. M .JONES, Dee n t) fnda ts. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Ci l to No 7:8 c 0 1 8 viAci n . 1 -v- 0 6 M EM ORANDUM OPI ON NI By: Jac onL. s r ks Kie Se orUnie St e Dit c Judge ni td ats srit . De mond La a J s pr ee ng pr K,fld a cvi rg sc wr nce one , oc di o e i l i ht ompl i , s n t 42 ant pur ua t o . U. C.j1 3.By Or re e e J y6,2018 t co tdiece plhlift s twihi 20 S. 98 de ntr d ul ,he ur r td a tf o qbmi t n da 9om t daeoft Or rt flngf i f 1 orot r s r s ndbe us t pli if ys he t he de he ii ee n u1 he wie epo ca e ie antf h sb e r la e 9o ic r e ain a di n ln e s b e t ot pr v so o t eP io r a e n ee s d m n a c rto n s o o g r u j c t he o iins f h rs ne LiiainReom Ac, ihalwe panift p yte$ 5 .0fln fevai tl ns tg to fr twhc lo d litf o a h 3 00 iig e i nsal t. me Pli tf wa a s dt taf l et co y woul r ul i dim is lo t sa ton wihout a n if s dvi e ha aiur o mpl d es t n s s a f hi c i t prj ie eudc . M o et n 20 da ha e a e a pl i ifhasf l t c r ha ys ve l ps d, nd antf aied o ompl wih t des dbe y t he c d c n iin .Ac o dngy,h c u t imis stea to wi u p eu iea dsrke t ec s o dto s c r i l t e o r ds se h cin t t rj dc n ti s h ae ho fo t a tvedoc toft c t Pl i ifma r fl t cai si as pa a eaci o e r m he c i ke he our. antf y e e he l m n e r t ton nc pl ntf spr pa e t co pl w11 t no e c ndii . ai ifi e r d o m y 11 he t d o tons The Clr i die t d t s ac o t sM e a z Opi o a a ompa ng e k s r c e o end opy f hi mor ndlm ni n nd cc nyi Or rt pl i if de o antf. Jones v. Jones ENTER:TI / Doc. 11 da ofJ y, 8. y ul 201 . ' . 2 $ Se o Urie Stt ititJ ni lt d a es src udge Dockets.Justia.com $
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
