Wilkerson v. Walrath et al, No. 7:2017cv00562 - Document 12 (W.D. Va. 2018)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Senior Judge Glen E. Conrad on 2/9/2018. (slt)

Download PDF

CL ERK:OFFI U, . ST. CQ : DI COUR' ATROANOKE, VA FI ED L FEB 2! 2 1 22 IN TH E U NITED STATES' I D STRICT CO UR T FO R TH E W ESTER N DISTRICT O F W RG I I N A R OAN O K E D I SIO N W D ON TA Z LA TR AY M QLK ER SO N , JUL C. DUD BY: 7Y ,C P' F h f CA SE N O .7: 17CV00562 Pl ntf , ai if V. M EM O R ANDU M O PI N NIO JOHN E.W M Z TH, K , M c By:Hon.GlnE.Conra e d Se orU pie St e D it i tJudgq ni t d at s s r c Defnda t) e nts. D on a La r y W ike s n,a V igi a i m a e pr c edi g pr K ,br ugh t s c vi rgh s t z ta l ro r ni n t o e n o o t hi i l i f a to u d r4 U. C.j1 8 ,algn ta ofcasa Rie No t Co rcin lCe trh v cin n e 2 S. 9 3 le ig h t fiil t v r ri re t a ne a e l o unconstt i l r t i ed hi t noncont vi iaton f tve year a har her puni ent iutonaly es rct m o act st i or i s, s shm t n t y ha i e on ot rsmial st td i t . Among ot rde nbsf rle, ha he ve mposd he i lry iuae nmaes he ma or eif W ikes nha move fratmporr r sr ni orgra aprlmi r ij to t rganhi l ro s d o e ay etai ng d nd ei nay nuncin o e i s c t c vi ia i n prvie s whie t s l w s ti pe n A fe r vi w o t r c d,t c r on a t st to i l ge l hi a ui s ndi g. t r e e f he e or he ou t c l st tt es m otonsm us be de e onc ude ha h e i t ni d. Thepa t se ng apr i nay ij tonmus ma ace rs ngRha hei lkel ry e ki elmi r nunci t ke la howi t t s i y t s cc e o t e m e is t a he i lke y t s f rir pa a e ha m i t a e e ofpr i i r o u ed n h rt , h t s i l o uf e r e r bl r n he bs nc elm na y rlef t tt balnc ofe testps i hi fvo,a t ta ij ton i i t publc ei , ha he a e quii i n s a r nd ha n nunci s n he i ' nt i ees.1 W i er v NaurlRe .De.Councl I ,5 U. 7,20 ( ) The pa t s ntr t' ta s f i. nc. 55 S. 2008 . ry' ' . pl q ng mus s ts y a l ourf t r o t W i e sa r t wa r nts h r i f I a 20. e di t a if 1 f ac o s f he nt r t nda d o r a uc ele . d. t TheEqua Pr e tonClus oft Foure nhAme me de lrsta tl oStt s l l otci a e he te t nd nt cae h t çnl ae hal Wilkerson v. Walrath et al Doc. 12 . . . de yt a pes ...hee ual otci oft lws'U. Cons-a nd. V,j1 Thi n o ny ron t q pr e ton he a - S. t, me XI ' . s 1 W ikes alo r quet a tmporr r sr ni or r Te r r r tai ng or r a e is d onl l ron s e ss e ay etai ng de . mpo a y esr ni de s r s ue y rrl wh ntemo a tpo e ta h wil ufrij r i rl fi n tga tdb fr t8a v repat c udb aey, e h v n rv s h t e ls fe nuy f ei s o rne eo e h d es r o l e e y n t ida dh v o p ru i t rso d S eFe . Ci P. 5b .S c a o d r udo l ls u t s c tme oie n a e p otnt o ep n . e d R. v. 6 () u h n r e wo l ny at ni uh i f y l a ah aig o apei n r ijn t nc ud b arn e . Asi i cerfo teo te ta Wi esn i n t s e rn n rl ay nu ci o l e ra g d mi o t s la r m h ust pt l ro s o k e tldt apei n r ij n t n tec u tid n b ssu o whc t ga t i atmp rr rsriigod r nie o rl ay nu ci ,h o rfn s o mi p n ih o rn hm e o ay etann r e. t mi o Dockets.Justia.com pr vi i doe no a t ge he f bi s a e f o cl s iyi i i dua s r t r i E e o son s t lo t r or d t t s r m a s f ng nd vi l ; a he t G ps ke go r e ald i i nm a r f om te tn dif r n l pe s who a e i a 1r l va r pe t ve nm nt ec s o ke s r r a i g f e e ty r ons r n l e e nt es c s alk ' Nodlng rv. hn,5 U. 1 1 ( 9 . ie- r i e Ha 05 S. , 0 1 92) ' gl s c edon a e ua pr e to cli apli ifmus frtde nsrt ta to uc e n q l otcin am, antf t is mo tae h t he hasbeen Sèat dif enty fom ot sw ih whom he i si iary siuat and r ed f er l r her t s m l l t ed t hat t unequal t eat ent w as t r t of i entonal or pur he r m he esul nt i posef ul dicrm i i Once t s s i i m ade, t court pr s i naton. hi how ng s he oceeds t det r i o e m ne wh te t e ds ai i te t n c n b j siid u d rt e rq st lv lo eh r h ip rt n rame t a e u t e n e h e uiie e e f y f s utny. cr i ' Kerv.Mas lUni Bd.ofGo nz s 8 F. 62,82(t Ci.201 ( tngMoni o v. r rhal v. ve or, 24 3d 4h r 6) quoi sn Gar ht 2 F. 6 ,65 ( hCi. ). rag y, 39 3d 48 4 4t r 2001) W ike s m a t c ncl or s a e e t t hi pd ly e e de ot r i a e ' l r on kes he o us y t t m nt ha s na t xc e d he nm t s penali under si iar cicum s a . H i com pl nt and ot subm i si how ever f lt tes ml r t nces s ai her s ons, , ai o s a e f s concer ng any partcul i t t t act ni i ar ns ancesw hen ot i at r ved l erpenali aft her nm es ecei ess tes er sm iardi plnar i r i or s i l sci i y nf actons, how t ofi al i entonaly i pos a har herpenaly on hat fci s nt i l m ed s t W ike s t di c i i t a i t hi . Acc r ngl u r t a i a e sa r i W i e , l r on o s rm ha e ga ns m o di y, nde he pplc bl t nda d n nt r W ike s n ha no de onsr t d t the i lke y t s cc e o t m e isofhi e lpr e to l r o s t m ta e ha s i l o u e d n he rt s qua ot c i n c ai o t the i lke y t s f rt ir pa a eha m ofc tnu vi a i ofhi c ns iuto l m r ha s i l o uf e he r e r bl r on i ed ol ton s o tt i nal rgh s i t a é e ofi e l ut y r le . Th r f e t co tco ude t tt r que t d i t n he bs nc ntroc or eif e e or , he ur ncl s ha he e se r lefi no wa r nt d a wilde W ike s ' m o i ns2 A n a pr i t or e wile e t s e i s t r a e nd l ny l r on s to . p opra e d r l nt r hi N day. sx - : Thi rsR. s é% d yo bu r, 2018. l a ryeray Seni U nied St esD iti J or t at srct udge 2 Be us W i s n i notr p e e t byc e i t sa ton, s pa aeor r t c ur w ilgrnthi ca e l o s ker e r s ned ouns ln hi ci by e r t dk ,he o t l a m t oppo tniyt fl a a e dc pl nt he ru t o ie n m nde om ai .

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.