Venable v. Nunn et al, No. 7:2017cv00495 - Document 16 (W.D. Va. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 2/13/2018. (slt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
eLERI OFFI U.S, ST O CE AT > NOK DI . COURT I THE UM TED STATES DI N STRI COURT CT FOR THE W ESTERN DISTRI OF W RGI A CT NI R O A NO K E DI SI N W O JO HNNY L. VENABLE, 1 , 11 Pl ntf, ai if E, VA FI LED FEB 12 2 1 22 J BYu @ Ci lAc i No.7: 7- vvi ton 1 c 00495 c . lr?. . . , .... I . x . K '; ' e:. ., . . . : ' ' y .. q e . B:-- . c r''., 'p . '. . .. .. . . -... M EM ORANDUM OPI NION BRAD NUNN,e al t , Dee nts. fnda t) By: M i hae F. c l Urbans ki ChifUnie St t sDit i tJudge e td a e src J hn yL. n b e 11pr c e igp oK,ie acvirg t c mplitp ru n t 4 U.. j o n Ve a l, 1, o e dn r fld i l ih s o an , u s a t o 2 SC. ' 1 983,whiei a c r t d. By isOr re e ed Oc o r30, 7, heco ta s dpl i ift ta l nc r e a e t de nt r t be 201 t ur dvi e antf ha t f iur t updat am a lng add es afe ata f rorr l s 9om i r r ton wilr ul i dim is al e o e ii r s tr r ns e eea e nca ce a i l es t n s s al o t sa ton. f hi c i The c ur' m a lt pl i ifha be n r t ne a undei r bl ,a pli ifha notc a t d o ts i o antf s e e ur d s lve a e nd antf s ont c e t co tsnc De e r29,201 Pli iff ie t c he ur i e c mbe 7. antf a ld o ompl wih t c tsOr rr uii pl i if y t he our' de eq rng antf t m ant i a a c aem a lng a es . The e o e t co tsndst tpli iff l t pr ec et s o i an n c ur t ii ddr s r f r , he ur ha a ntf aied o os ut M a to p ru n t Fe ea Rueo CiiPr c d e41b , no c mp yn wi t c u tsJ n ay 1 , cin, u s a t o d r l l f vl o e m () by t o l ig t he o r' a u r 2 h 2 8 Or e.Ac o d n l, ds s tea to wii u p eudc a dd n a1 e d n moinsa mo t 01 , d r c r i gy I imis h ci n t o t rj ie n e y l p n i g to s o Se Balr v. rs n, 8 F.d 9 , 6( t Ci.1 8 )(ttn p o. ltg n saes b e t ot e l d Ca lo 8 2 2 3 9 4h r 9 9 sai g r j i a t r u j c t i a . i : me rq ie n sa rs e tf rc u t r r a d s sa i a a p o raes n to frno c mpin e ; e ur me t nd e p c o o r o des nd imis l s n p r p it a cin o n-o la c ) Do el v. o n - a vleSae Co .6 7F.d3 9 3 041( dCi.1 8 )(e o nzn ad src mll J h sM n il ls m , 7 2 3 , 4 - 3 r 9 2 r c g iig itit y c u t ys as o t d s s a a to pzs n t Fe R. v. 41b ) o r ma u p ne imis n cin l ua t o d. Ci P. ( ). r The Cl r i die t t s nd c e oft sM e or ndlm Opi o a t ac mpa ngOr r e k s r ced o e opi s hi m a l ni n nd he co nyi de Venable v. Nunn et al Doc. 16 t t pa te . o he r i s ENTER: l /3 dyo Fb zr,08 Tls i a f enay2 1. k jr .. ' . . . .. q .. @ . . . .. ' , .. . :'j;: :. . 2 . ; . , ChifUnie St e Diti udge e td ats sr 7 Dockets.Justia.com * .. . $q. ' . . 4' . ).:, ' k . .. ., '
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
