Wilson v. Gilliam et al, No. 7:2017cv00347 - Document 5 (W.D. Va. 2017)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on 9/20/2017. (tvt)

Download PDF
Wilson v. Gilliam et al Doc. 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION DUSTIN WILSON, Plaintiff, v. JOSHUA GILLIAM, et al, Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 7:17-cv-00347 MEMORANDUM OPINION By: Norman K. Moon United States District Judge Dustin Wilson, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. By Order entered August 21, 2017, because plaintiff was released from incarceration and no longer subject to the provisions of the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act, which allowed plaintiff to pay the $350.00 filing fee via installments, the court directed plaintiff to submit within 20 days from the date of the Order the fee in full or otherwise respond to the Order within the time allowed. Plaintiff was advised that a failure to comply would result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. More than 20 days have elapsed, and plaintiff has failed to comply with the described conditions. Accordingly, the court dismisses the action without prejudice and strikes the case from the active docket of the court. Plaintiff may refile the claims in a separate action once plaintiff is prepared to comply with the noted conditions. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and accompanying Order to plaintiff. 20th ENTER: This _________ day of September, 2017. Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.