Gardner v. Clarke, No. 7:2017cv00333 - Document 3 (W.D. Va. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 8/14/2017. (slt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CLERKSOFFI U, . ST. URCE S DI O . AT ROANOKE, VA FIED L I THE UM TED STATESDI CT COURT N STRI FOR TH E W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI CT RGI A NI R O AN O K E DI SI N W O ALC lù 2 1 27 J I a ULA DUD BY: ( ) JEFFERY J.GARDNER, Pl ntf , ai if V. H A R O LD CL AR K E, De e a t) f nd nts. CL RK - cL Ci lA c i N o.7: c 00333 vi t on 17- v- ) ) ) ) ) ) ) M EM O R AN D U M O PI I N N O By: G l n E.C onr e ad U nied St e D it i tJudge t at s s r c Ant ny J Le sKiby, oc edi pr K ,fld aci lrght c ho oe wi r ' pr e ng o ie vi i s ompli , l uantt a nt ptrs o . . 42U. C.j 1 S. 983.By o de e ee J y 1 201 t c tdie tdpli ift s twili r r ntrd ul 7, 7,he our rce antf o ubmi tln 20 da 9om t da eoft or ra sae e ofa s t f r ,a i t a ountf r ,a a ys he t he de t tm nt s e s o m n nma e cc o m nd c rii d co ofpl i ifstus fl ac ot sae e f rt sx- o h pe e tfe py antf r t l nd c mt t tm nt o he i m nt dod i me ael m di t y pr ce ngt flng oft c e di he ii he ompli ,obti d 9om t a opraepds of i lofe h prs ant a ne he ppr i t on sc a ac ion a whih pl i ifi orwa c me d t c antf s s onf d udng t tsx- o h pe i a we lasaverfe sa e t ha i m nt rod, s l ii d t t men f m wih a compa ng docl e a i de onsr tng t tpli ifha et re usedt or t c nyi lm ntton m ta i ha a ntf d ihe xha t he a l er me e a t e h oft c am sr s d i t c vaiabl e di s s o ac he l i aie n he ompli t ordoc e t ts h an, um nt ha uc rme isddn t xita t ep e e ipa eo c v n me to ween ta albl t plitf a t e e de i o e s t h r sn lc f o e n , r r o v i e o anif t h a pr e tme.Pl ntf wasad s dt taf llet c ywo drs ti dimis loft s eint i ai if vie ha aitr o ompl ul e ul n s s a hi a to wih u p eu ie cin t o t rj dc . M or t n 20 da ha ea e a pli ifha f ie t co y wiht des i d e ha ys ve lps d, nd a ntf s al d o mpl t he crbe c ndto .Ac o dn l t ec u t imis st ea to wi o t rj d c a srk st ec s o i ns c r i gy,h o r ds se h ci n t u p 'u ie nd tie h a e i h e 9o t aci doc toft c t Pli ifm a r fl t c am si as pa ae a ton onc m he tve ke he our. a ntf y e ie he l i n e r t c i e pli ifi pr pa e t co pl wih t not d c to . antf s e r d o m y t he e ondii ns TheClr i die t d t s nda c oft sM e or ndum Opi on a ac m pa ng ek s rce o e opy hi m a ni nd co nyi Gardner v. Clarke Doc. 3 Or rt pli if de o antf. s rx:v i l xs hs ç* ' dyo au ut2 1. a r gs 0, , - ' U nie St t s Di t i tJ t d a e sr c udge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
