Turpin v. Sheriff et al, No. 7:2017cv00316 - Document 25 (W.D. Va. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Senior Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 2/15/2018. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
cu K' oFr p.. r ootr eR s fcs s as , l l AT DAMVILE, L VA RL ED I THE UNI STATESDI TRI COURT N TED S CT FO R TI E W ESTERN DI I STRI OF VI CT RGI A NI R O AN O K E D I I O N V SI FRANK ASHONTA TURPI N FEB l5 C$ 1 2 U BY: ' o U ' . c Ci lAci No.7: c 00316 vi ton 17-v- Pl ntf , ai if V. M EM ORANDUM OPI ON M ST ER I e a . T FF, t l, De e f ndant . s By: H o Jac on L.K i er n. ks s Se or Unie St e Dit i tJudge ni t d at s s r c ie vi i s c i Fr nk As aTur n,aVigilapds rpr e ng pr K ,fl d aci lrght a ton n hont pi r ri one oc edi o . pts a t o4 U. C.1 8 , n n teS nifo Ly h u g teBleRig Re i n lJ i t u n t 2 S. r 9 3 n mig h he f f nc b r ,h u d e go a al ( i'Auho iy a dJ i Ad isr trTi t yTrn a d fnd n s Upo rc ii t e : 1) t rt , n al mi tao moh e t s ee a t . n e evng h Va ' co ai ,hec te e e an Or ri J y 2017 a vii Pli tf t themus m ant i a mpl nt t our nt r d de n ul d sng a n if ha t i an n ac ur t add e sofr or f rt sc e a t taf itr t do s w ilr s ti dimi s loft s c ae r s ec d o hi as nd ha a lle o o l e ul n s s a hi Case. On Ocobe 1 201 t de e t r 6, 7, he f ndan sfl d am o i t dimi sa s ntac t t ie ton o s s nd e opy o Pl ntf. On t ne da t Clr is aNotc t tad s d Pli ift tam o i t ai if he xt y, he e k s ued i e ha vie a ntf ha ton o dim iswastl d on Oc o r31 201 a t tPl i ifhadt nt one da fo t Notc t s s se t be , 6, nd ha antf we yys r m he ie o fl ar s e. TheNotc f t rad s d: ie e pons ie urhe vie I Pli if does no r s f antf t e pond ... t Cour wil as lme t t Pli if has l t , he t l sl ha a ntf os i e es ilt ca e a ort tPli ifa e wih wha t De e ntsa e i nt r t r he s , nd/ ha a ntf gr es t t he f nda t t s n t i r s o i pe dngs . I Plitf wih st c n iu wih t e c s ,i i her e p nsve la i t) f anif s e o o tn e t h m e t s nec s a y t t Pl ntf r s e s r ha ai if e pond i a a o it f hi n .... Howe r i n n ppr pra e as o ve . f Pl ntf doe not 5l s m e r pons wihi t t nt one ( ) da pe i t ai if s e o es e t n he we v21 v rod, he Turpin v. Sheriff et al Cour ma dim ist c s f f llet pr e ut t y s s he a e or aitr o os c e. Doc. 25 Noie( n 2 )(dgn l mp ss. tc ECF o. 2 o ia e ha i) Pl ntf di notr s ndt t N o i ort m oton t dim is andt Notc was ai if d e po o he tce he i o s s , he i e r tln d a t lve a e Ptrua t t Or re t r d i J y 2017and t Notc e e ed o ear e s mdei r bl . ts nt o he de n e e n ul he ie nt r n Dockets.Justia.com Oc o r1 201 Ifndt tPl i ifhasf l dt pr e ut t sc s Ac r ngl t t be 7, 7, i ha antf aie o os c e hi a e. co di y,he c mpan i d s s e wi u p eudc frPlitf sfit et p o e ue pu s a tt Fe R. o lit s imis d t t rj ie o an if all o r s c t, ru n o d. ho r Ci. 41b , n a1 e igmo in aede idwih u p eu iea mo t Se Likv. v P. () a d 1 p ndn to s r ne t o t rj d c s o. e n W a m hR. Co.3 0U. 6 6 6 0 31( 9 2 (& ea t o iyo ac u tod s s s as o t b s R. , 7 S. 2 , 3 - 1 6 ) : u h rt f o r t imis u p n e Th f l c ofpr ec i ha ge r lybe n c i r d a çnhe e powe , ... c s dl ve t or a k os uton s ne al e onsde e n i r nt r' ne es a y sed i c tt ma n ours o naget i own a f r s a t a hivet or ry a e dii diposton of her fais o s o c e he de l nd xpe tous s ii C SS' . a e .) ' ENTER :Thi s = da ofFe ua y, 201 y br r 8. J - l Se ' Unied St t sDit tJ or t a e sdc udge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
