Ham v. United States of America, No. 7:2017cv00295 - Document 3 (W.D. Va. 2017)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 6/27/2017. (tvt)
Download PDF
G ERK' DFFI U. DI S CE S. 3T. AT RO,>QKE. '1 : . VA i I TH E U N I N TED STA TES DI STRI T C O UR T C FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF W RGI A CT NI R O A N O K E DI I O N V SI JO H N FO R RE ST H A M , . JR , J 2? 2 1 UN 27 U - :.-.'1* ULI . . , BY: C A SE N O .7: 17CV 00295 Pe ii r, t tone V. M EM OM NDUM OPI ON NI UNI TED STATES OF AM ERI CA, By: H on.Gln E.Conr e ad C hi fU nie St e D it i tJudge e t d at s s r c R e ponde . s nt J l Fo r s H a , J . a i at a t U nied St t s Pe t nta y i Lee Count om r e t m r , n nm e t he t ae nie i r n y, Vigi a,fl d t s a ton,pr s a a pe ii f a wrt of ha a cor unde 28 U . C. r ni ie hi c i o e, s tton or i be s pus r S. j2241 Hnm algest the s d ber s ntnc d,bec us hi fderlcrmi lsntnce i . le ha houl ee e e a e s e a i na e e s unlwf lt rM ahi v.Unied St t , U . a u mde t s t aes S. - - , 1 6 S Ct2 43( 01 )a dJ h o v Urtd 3 . . 2 2 6 n o ns n . l e i Sae , U. ,1 S.Ct 2551( 5) Upon rviw o t r or t c tc l st t tts S. 35 . 201 . e e f he ec d, he our oncude ha Hn s cam f r i unde j 2241 i t s c ti a opdaey c t ed a a moton t m' li or elef r n hi our s ppr tl onsnz s i o v c t , e a i o c pe t h sn e c u d r2 U. C. 2 5 a dta ser dt t es n e cn a ae st sde r o c t e e tn e n e 8 S. j 2 5 n rn fre o h e tn i g cour . t Hn ' peii a co r co ds aval bl onlne i cae t tHn pl de guly i m s tton nd urt e r ia e i ndi t ha m ea d it n 201 i t Unied St t s Ditit Cotr f Sout Ca olna t pos e so of a fr r a a 0 n he t a e src zt or h r i o s sin iea m s c n itd fln,c a k n ,a d p se so o a fr am i f rh rn e o a ci o vo e c . o v ce eo mj c i g n o s sin f ie r n u tea c f rme f iln e Th c u tsn e c d Ha t 31 mo t si pi o . Th j g n wa afr d o a p a, nd e o r e tn q m o 9 nh n zs n e ud me t s fime n p e l a Hn s j2 5 mo in i te So t Caoi DititCo r wa t u c s f l Assae ,Hn m' 2 5 to n h uh r l na src u t s ms c e su . ttd m Ham v. United States of America Doc. 3 no p tto st sc u tu d rj 2 41 f rh be sc r u r l fu d rt e M ah sa d J h o w ei n hi o r n e 2 o a a o p s ei n e h i e ti n o ns n de i i ns H n bele s t t hi s nt nc i unco tt i lbe aus pr or c c so . m i ve ha s e e e s ns i ona c e i onvi t o us d t m c i ns e o e nc t s nt nc a l edl no l r qua iy aspr di a esunde t A r e Ca e r Crm i l nha e he e e e leg y onge lf e ct r he m d r e i na A c a t Ca ee Ofe rgui lne. t nd he r r f nde de i Dockets.Justia.com Assa e Hn ' c am c le est l ga iy ofhi f de als nt nce a i t t d, m s l i hal ng he e lt s e r e e s mpos d. Suc e h cai mus nomal beried on a alori a j2255 moton i t s ntncng c t I r l ms t r ly as ppe n i n he e e i our. n e J n s 2 6 F.d 3 8,3 2 (t Ci.2 0 ) Peio rs j 2 41peiin r iig s c cams i o e , 2 3 2 3 4 h r 0 0 . tt ne ' 2 i t o asn u h li s t bard t e si me t t srnge sandad ma td l rt J re mls t es he ti nt t r ndae mde he onesdecso L=. t333iin. d a 34 (i dng t t c aln e t fd r lc n cin i b re fo rviw u d r j 2 41 a e ta fn i ha h le g o e ea o vito s ar d r m e e n e 2 bs n s howi t tunde apos- onviton c ng ha r tc c i hangei t lw,peii rsof e eco uc i no l er n he a ttone ' f ns nd t s ong ci n l. Be a e n ih rt e M ah sd cso n rte J hn o d cso h d n efc o te rmia) c us et e h t i e ii n o h o s n e ii n a o fe t n h ci n ly o Hn sf d r lo fns c n u t h c n o p o e d wih h scam t e j 2 41 rmiai f m' e ea fe e o d c, e n n t r c e t i li md r 2 . t Theef e t c twilde r le unde j2241,c t e Ha ' s sin a a j 2255 r or, he our l ny eif r onsnz m s ubmiso s m oton, a ta f r i t t Unie Stt Ditit Cour f So h Ca olna f r f rhe i nd r ns e t o he t d aes src t or ut r i o ut r pr e ngsi lghtoft r c ntc tde sonsHa cies oc edi n i he e e our cii m t .TheCl r i die t d t s nd c e e k s r c e o e opi s oft sm e a hi mor ndum o ni n a a co pa ng or rt peii r pi o nd c m nyi de o ttone . s s Ti qQa oln,07 xT R: hs y fue2 1. Chi fUrie St t Diti tJ e lt d aes src udge 2