Dotson v. Clarke, No. 7:2017cv00269 - Document 10 (W.D. Va. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 8/2/2017. (mlh)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CLERK' OFFI U. DI COUX B CE S. SI AT DANVI LE, L VA FI LED I Tu E v x l o slw lx s m sTm cT c o c R' x u r . FOR THE w ssl xux ol Tm c' ol ucl A s r ?w xl R O AN O K E D I SI N W O K EV I D O TSO N N , AL -2 2 7 C 2 . J uL BY: l o . c : - , Ci lA c i n N o.7: : 00269 DE vi t o 17- v- Pl ntf , ai if V. M EM O R AND U M O PI I N N O DI ECT O R H A R O LD CL AR K E, R D ef endant . By: H on. ks L.K i e Jac on sr Se or U ni e St esD i t i tJudge ni t d at src Ke n Doton,aVigi ai aepr e i pr #q c vi s r ni nm t oc ed ng o , omm e dtlsci la ton ptrua t nce li vi c i zs n - t 4 U.. j1 3b n e rirta Jme6 2 7 At h o s to t ea to t ec u t o 2 SC. 98 y o ale h n t , 01 . t e n e f h cin,h o r pe mitdPl ntf oa yt pr e L fr pau rsbuta s dPlitf ha s h r te ai ift ppl o oce d q oma pei dvie anift t uc pe mison wo d ber s i d i Pli tf sha t e prorc esdim is d a f i ous r si ul e cnde f a n ifha d hr e i as s s e s rvol , maiiu , rf rf ilet saeacam, t s a t o2 U. C. 1 5 g . lco s o o alr o tt li pl u n t 8 S. j 91 ( ) t r Upon ar vi ofc 'r or , ta a sPl i ifhasha a l a tt e non- bea cvi e ew oul ec ds i ppe r antf t d t e s hr e ha s i l ac i o a al pr vi l d s i s d a f i o ,asm a i i ,orf f ii t s a e a c a m tons r ppe s e ousy i m s e s rvol us lc ous or a lng o t t l i be or com m e i t s a ton. Se D ot on v. a f e nc ng hi c i e s Poc hont s St t Con' Ct . N o.7: 7c a ae . r, 1 v195,si lp o ( . Va Jme 1 2 7 ( imisdwi u p eudc a gi oo ) Do s nv. tdS ae p.W D. . t , 01 ) d s se t t rj ie s v lus; to Uni tts ho e Dit Co r, . 1 c 9 si o ( . Va Jme1 2 7 ( imisdwi u p eudc a s. u tNo 7:7 v1 4, lp p.W D. . t , 01 ) ds se t t rj ie s ho fi lt ) Dos nv. le, . :3 v 7 , l o a 2( . Va De . , 01 )(imis d rvoot ; to TelrNo 7 1 c 4 6 si p. t W D. . c 6 2 3 ds se s p wih u p eu iea fi lu ) s eas Coe nv. les n 1 5S. . 7 9 1 6 ( 01 ) t o t rj dc s rvoo s; e lo lma To lfo , 3 Ct 1 5 , 7 3 2 5 (o dn aç tie' imis l sc u tdrg r ls t t tmigo as b e u n a p a) M c a h l ig t rk 'd s s a i o n e e a de s o he i n f u s q e t p e l; Le n s Dotson v. Clarke v. ie Sae , 6 F.d3 , 9 ( t Ci. 0 9 ( tn d s saswih u p eu ief r Untd tts 5 6 3 91 3 9 4h r 2 0 ) noig imis l t o t rj dc o Doc. 10 fi ous s s dnotbee mptdfom 28U. C.j1 5( ) rvol ne s houl xe e ' r S. 91 g). A f e r vi w i Pl i i f s s i s o i t s c vi ac i n,i i cl a t tPl i ifdoe no t r e e ng a ntf ubm s i ns n hi i l t o t s e r ha a ntf s t a l ge a f c si c tng t the i c r nty unde a i m i ntt ea ofa s r ousphysca le ny a t ndi a i ha s ur e l r ny m ne hr t ny e i i l ij r wi nt me nn o 28U. C. 1 5 g .Ac o dn l , ds s t ea to . t o t nu y t he n ig f hi S. j 91 () c r ig y I imis h cin wih u Dockets.Justia.com . ' . . . p eudc d et Pli tf' f i r t p yt tln fea t tmeo fl t ec mpan .S e rj ie u o anifs al e o a he iig e the i f i h o lit e . u ng e:, p e v. l r 2 4F.d 1 3 ,1 3 ( 1hCi. 0 )(e s rn t tt efln fei d e ..Du re Pame , 8 3 2 4 2 7 1 t r 20 2 r a ol g ha h iig e s u i upo ûlngaci la tonFhe L fr pa rspr sonsdonota yt pli ifa t tt n i vi ci n q o ma upei ovii ppl o antf nd ha he c ti no r quie t pe tpl i ifa opporuniy t pa t flng f eafe r c zi our s t e r d o nni antf n t t o y he ii e tr e ogni ng pl ntf i i lgi et pr ee i f mapa rs. ai if s nei bl o oc d q or upei) l EN TER : Thi da ofA ugus ,201 y t 7. ' ' * < ' 2 *$ o U nie St t s D it i tJ r t d a e s rc udge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
