Coulson v. Gardner et al, No. 7:2017cv00264 - Document 18 (W.D. Va. 2017)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 11/7/2017. (tvt)

Download PDF
CL ERK: OFFI ù. DI COURT CE s. sT. AT DANVILE, L VA FI LED d 27 2 1 2V ' 07 I TH E UN I D STA TE S D I N TE STR I CO UR T CT FO R TH E W ESTERN DISTR I O F V I G I I CT R N A ROANOK E DI SI VI ON TR AVI DALE COULSON, S Pl nt f , ai i f ajlcxDR c R YLH L L K aA ; u . x pt u nk nyc C i lAc i N o.7: 7- vvi t on 1 c 00264 M EM O M ND U M O PI I N N O J.B.G A RD N ER ,e al, t . D efendant s. By: H on.Jackson L .K i ser . Se or U nie St e Di t i tJudge ni t d at s s r c Tr vi Da eCoulon,aVig ni prs rpr e ng pr K ,fld a cvi rght aci n a s l s r i a ione oc edi o ie i l i s to purua tt 42U. C.j1 3.OnSe e r29;201 t dee t fl amoi t dimis s n o S. 98 ptmbe 7,he fndans ied ton o s s. On t ne busne sda t Clr i s d aNotc t ta s d Pl ntf t tt m o i t he xt i s y, he e k s ue i e ha dvie ai if ha he ton o dimi swa ûld o Se e r29,201 a t tPl ntf ha t nt o da fom t N o i s s s e n pt mbe 7, nd ha ai if d we y- ne ys r he tce t f l a r pons The N otc f r he a s o ie es e. i e u t r dvi ed: I Pl i if doe no r s f antf s t e pond .., t Co twil a s . he ur l s ume t t Pl i if ha l t ha antf s os i e e ti t c e,a o t tPl i ifag e swih wha t De e ntsa e .... nt r s n he as nd/ r ha antf r e t t he f nda t t s I Pli ifwihest c i wih t c s ,i i ne e s r t tPl i ifr pond i f antf s o ontnue t he a e t s c s a y ha antf es n a a oprae f hi .... Howe r i Pli if doe not fl s m e r s ns n ppr i t as on ve . f antf s ie o e no e wi nt et n y o e ( )d y p ro ste Co r ma d s s t ec s frfize t h we t - n 21 a e id h u t y imis h a e o alr hi l t pr ecut o os e. Notc ( No.1 (rgi e ie ECF 7) o i nal mpha i) ss. Pl ntf di notr po t t Notc ort moton t dim is a t Notc wasnot ai if d es nd o he i e he i o s s , nd he ie r t ne t t co 'a unde i r bl Plrua tt t Notc e e ed on Ocobe 2, e ur d o he ul s t lve a e. zs n o he i e nt r t r 2017, fnd Ii t tPl ntf ha f ie t pr e t t s c s A c di y, he c pl i i di m i s w ihout ha ai i f s a l d o os cu e hi a e. cor ngl t om a nt s s s ed t Coulson v. Gardner et al p eu ief rPlitf' f i r t p o e u e pt s n t F d R. v. 41b , n al e dng rj d c o anifs al e o r s c t, l ua t o e . Ci P. ( ) a d lp n i u r Doc. 18 moinsa ed n e wi o t eudc a mo t Se Li lv W a ahR. Co, 7 U. 6 6 6 0 to r e id t u prj ie s o. e nt . b s R. .3 0 S. 2 , 3 h 31( 962)Ct' a hort ofac tt dimiss s ef l k ofpr e utonhasge r ly 1 xhe ut iy our o s s ua pont or ac os c i ne al be n c i r d a Snhe entpow e , ... e s rl ves e i co t t m a ge t i ow n afais e ons de e n i r r ' nec s a iy t d n urs o na he r f r Dockets.Justia.com s a t a hivet or rya e dii dipostonofca e . o s o c e he de l nd xpe tous s ii s s' ). + ENTER : s ' Thi a ofN ove r 201 y mbe , 7. e $ Se rUnie St t sDititJ n' t d a e src udge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.