Hurd v. Commonwealth of Va., No. 7:2017cv00237 - Document 11 (W.D. Va. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 8/1/2017. (mlh)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
ck Ng' or g:g nl'Qeur n : nç qr A p l iiV T Awl ,A FI LED I THE UNI STATESDI CT COURT N TED STRI FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRICT OF VI NI RGI A R O AN O K E D I SI N W O ALC -$ 2 1 27 J ! UL UD BY; ' D . L I N EL TH OM A S H UR D , O Pett oner, ii M EM OM NDUM OPI ON NI COM M ONW EALTH OF VA . , R espondent . By: L Ci lA c i N o.7: 7- v- 237 vi t on 1 c 000 V.' c RK Hon.Jac on L. ie ks K sr Se or U ni e St t sD i t i tJudge ni t d a e sr c Li lThom a Hur aVigi ai aepr e di pr K ,fl d ape ii f am ' o one s d, r ni nm t oc e ng o ie tton or i f t ha a c r uspls a t o28U. C. 2 5 t c aln etej d me te trdb t eCic t be s o p t u n t r S. j 2 4 o h l g h u g n n ee y h rui e Co r f rW a hngo Comt ( No. ) Cott e o d id c t ta Peiin rp e iu l u t o s i tn t y ECF 7 . t r c r s n iae h t t o e r vo sy r t fld aj2 5 p tto a o t h smej d me ti Ht dv. ak , . 1 c 81( . Va ie 2 4 ei n b u t e a u g n n t Clr e No 7:4 v3 W D. . i r De .1 , 01 ) Th s Pei o e ' c te t t ini as b e u n o e f lngt e te c 1 2 4 . u , tt n rs u rn pei o s u s q e t n ,al md r h i t i p o bto i 2 U. C. 2 4 *)a an tas c ndo s c e sv p tto Pt s n t t t r hiiin n 8 S. j 2 4 g is e o r u c s ie eiin. z ua t o ha r scton,afde a dititc t yco i rasco ors c si j225 peii onl upon ei e r l src our ma nsde e nd uc e sve 4 tton y s cii c ri a i fom aUnie St t Co tofAppeast tc am si t s e ntpeii pe fc e tsc ton r t d aes ur l ha l i n he ubs que tton m e ce t i c ie i . et r a n rt r a Peii rha nots ttone s ubmit a e de et theha o ai d t tc rtfc ton,a I ted ny vi nc ha s bt ne ha e ii a i nd mu t imist ep tto wih u p eu iea s c e sve n o t ecamseiil frha e s s d s s h eiin to t rj d c s u c si .No e f h li lgb e o b a r le de c i sane f tt ma as c pe ii non-uc es i See e. ,Pa tiv. ei f s rbe w ac o ke e ond tton s c sve. . c. ne t Ouatr n 5 U. 9 0 9 2 4 ( 0 7 ( ic si gfcsr lv n t sc n b t o s c e sve rema , 51 S. 3 , 4 - 7 2 0 ) ds u sn a t ee a t o e o d u n t u c si Hurd v. Commonwealth of Va. Doc. 11 pei o ) Ed r sv Baio , 2 U. 6 , 4 - 7( 9 7 (e o niigt edfee c s tt ns; wad . ls k 5 0 S. 41 6 5 4 1 9 ) rc g zn h ifrn e i b t e h b a r me isa dr me isa alb ei acv l ih sa to ) Ba e u o tefn ig ewe n a e s e de n e de v ia l n ii rg t ci n . s d p n h i dn t tPe ii rha no m ade t r qui ie s t nta s i ofa de alofa co tt i na r g ha ttone s t he e st ubs a i l how ng ni ns iuto l i ht Dockets.Justia.com a r q ie b 28U.. j2 5 /)a dS a kv. c n e, 2 U. 4 3 48 ( 0 0 , s e urd y SC. 2 3 n lc M Da il 5 9 S. 7 , 4 2 0 ) a ce tfcae o a a a lt i de ed. rii t f ppe l biiy s ni ENTER: Tli ls da ofAug t 201 y us, 7. Se rUnie St t sD i t i tJ n' t d a e s rc udge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
