Knight v. Cutchens et al, No. 7:2017cv00231 - Document 24 (W.D. Va. 2017)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 7/27/2017. (tvt)

Download PDF
z FRK' oFFlz :, nmm r. r N S ce y. G AT ROANOK:, 'VA Flio t - J 2? 2 1 UL 27 I TH E U NI N TED STA TES D I STR I C O U RT CT FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF W RGI A CT NI R O A N O K E D I SI N VI O W I ER JEROM E KM GHT, LM B I , Y #ULA : CASE NO.7: 17CV002 31 Pl ntif ai f , M EM O M N D U M O PI I N N O V. A. CUTCHENS, AL. c , D ef endant . By: G l n E.C onrad e U nie St t D i t c Judge t d a es s ri t W ime J r l r e ome Kni ,a Vigi a i t pr e ng pr K ,fl d t s aci n t r42 ght r ni nma e oc edi o ie hi to mde . U. C.j1 3 algi t tprs ofii sbr S. 98 le ng ha ion fcal oughtaf s dici i y chage a ns hi f ale s plnm' r gai t m or o c neac s r t it d a i thi by brngi an addii na dicplna y c r a ns hi f bs e t, eala e gans m i ng to l s i i r ha ge gai t m or flngc mpli saboutt i ta i i n unde t Pds Ra Elmi tonAc (TREA') a ii o ant he niil ncde t r he on pe i nai t1 ', nd ca e hi t be pl c i s e t d c us d m o a ed n egr ga e onfne ment Kni tha notpr pad t r quiie flng . gh s e i he e st ii f a a i t pr e L f mapa rs ee nd pples o oce d q or upei.Uponr viw oft rc d,t c ttndst tt ee he e or he our i ha he a to mu tbes mmmiy d s se wi u prj d c b s d o Kng tsp ircvi a to st a cin s u l imis d t t eu ie a e n ih ' ro i l cin h t ho ha bee dimi s d asfi ousorf rf itr t sae cai . ve n s s e rvol o alle o tt l m ThePrs Lii to Reonn Actof 1 s tntal n nde t t f ma pa rs ion tgain f 995 ubsa ily me d he q or upei sate 28 U.. j 1 5 Th p r s o t e Ac wa t rq ie alp io rl ia t s i ttt, z SC. 91 . e upo e f h t s o e ur l rs ne i g n s ung t gover nte ii s o ofi a st pa flng f s i 1 1,eihe t ough pr pay e ort oug nme ntte r fcil o y i ee n 1 t r hr e m nt hr h i sal ns wih ed fo t e l ia ts imae tu ta c u t j 1 5 b . S cin 1 5 g n tlme t t h l ' m h i g n ' n t r s c o n . 91 ( ) e to 91 () r t de est i t lm e pa e m ehod t prs r who ha Ghr e srkes'- t epls ne s ni he nsal nt ym nt t o ione s ve ç e ti ' t hos i o r Knight v. Cutchens et al Doc. 24 w ho ha ha t e pr vi ca es or a al di m i s as f i ous m a i i ,orf f l e t ve d hr e e ous s ppe s s s ed r vol , lc ous or aiur o saeacam, ne stet re srk ri maes o tmmie t a e o s ro sp y ia ij r . tt li u ls h h e -tie n t h ws l n n d ng r f eiu h sc ln u y' i ' j 1 5( . 91 g) Dockets.Justia.com , . Kni hasbr ugh s h a tonsora a son t e orm or prorocc sons Se Kni ht ght o t uc c i ppe l hr e e i ai . e g v Va o e , .7 1 CV0 3 7( . Va Oc.1 , 01 )( imisd wi o tp eu ieu d r2 . n v r No :2 0 3 W D. . t 9 2 2 d s se t u rj dc n e 8 h U. C.j1 1 A( )1 a fi oo s;Knc tv W o d No.3:0 0 51 ( D.Va J n. S. 9 5 b ( ) s rv lu ) ih . o v, 1 CV0 3 E. .a 2 2 ( imis dt e 2 U.. j 1 5 b ( )f rf i let saea cam a tro po t t t 01 ) ds s e md r 8 SC. 91 A()1 o alr o tt li fe p rt y o t mi n n ) Kn g tv. o n o , . 1 CV6 ( D. . e t 1 2 1 ( imisd u d r2 . S. me d ; ih J h sn No 3:0 48 E. Va S p . 4, 01 d s se n e 8U. C. ) j1 5 b ( )f rf i l t saeacam a tro p ru t t n n ) Ac o dngy Kng tma 91 A( )1 o alr o tt li fe p o tni o me d . c r i l, ih y te y pr e j f mapaupei ( t prpay ntoft flng fe onl i he c s t the oc ed . or n rs wihout e me he ii e ) y f an how ha fc si ne t a e o s ro p y ia ij r .j 1 5 g . a e mmi n d ng r f eius h sc ln u y 91 ( ) Kni ht s c r nt a l ga i do not s g ' ur e le tons ugge t t he w as i i m i nt dange of a s hat n m ne r ny p ysc lijly rltd t h scams a t tme h fld h s c mp an . Be a s t rc r s h ia nt eae o i li t he i e ie i o lit c u e he e o d r r fe tt tKn g th sa lattr eçt s' nd rj 1 5 g a dheh sno d mo tae t t elc ha i h a t e s h e G dke'u e 91 ( ) n s a t e nsr td ha hei i i ne da rofphysc lhnm,t cou tdeni hi t opporuniy t pr ee L s n mmi nt nge ia r he r es m he t t o oc d q f r p u ei a d ds se t ec mplitwih u p eu iet e j 1 5 g . An a p o rae o ma a p rs n imis s h o an to t rj dc md r 91 ( ) p r p it or rwilis t sda de l s ue hi y. The Clr i diec e t s nd c e oft sm e andum opi on a ac ompa ng e k s r t d o e opi s hi mor ni nd c nyi or rt pl i if de o a ntf . EN TER: Thi s $* d yo J y 2017. a f ul, Unie St t sDititJ e t d a e src udg

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.