Tibbs v. Wang et al, No. 7:2017cv00178 - Document 26 (W.D. Va. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER granting 16 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 21 Motion for Summary Judgment; and the action is STRICKEN from the court's active docket (Opinion and Order mailed to Pro Se Party). Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 12/22/2017. (tvt)

Download PDF
CL S OFFI U.S.DI COUU ERK' CE SX AT RDANOKE, VA JI LED DE2 26 . 1 27 2 I TH E UN I N TED STA TES D I STR I CO U R T CT FO R TH E W E STER N D I STR I O F V I G I I CT R N A ROANOKE DI I ON V SI A LB ERT L . I T BBS, Pl ntf , ai if V. L.W ANG,e al, t . D ef endant . s ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JULI , A BY: .C Ci lA c i N o.7: c 001 vi t on 17- v- 78 FI A L O R DER N By: Hon. i hae F.Ur M c l bans ki C hi fUni e St e D i t i Judge e t d at s s r ct / I a or nc wih t M e andu Opi on e e e t sda i i he e n cc da e t he mor m ni nt r d hi y, t s r by A DJUD G ED and O R DE RED t t fnd ns moi n f rs mmayj dg n a eGRANTED, n t ea to i STRI ha Dee a t' to s o u r u me t r a d h cin s CKEN f om t c ts a tve doc . r he our ' c i ket EN TER : Thi 'RJs da ofDe mbe , 2017. y ce r ' . . / w/ 4 . Chi fU nie St s Di t i tJ e e td s rc udg Tibbs v. Wang et al Doc. 26 Dockets.Justia.com , . *

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.