Peterson v. Smith et al, No. 7:2017cv00131 - Document 35 (W.D. Va. 2017)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 8/29/2017. (tvt)

Download PDF

r- FRK' OFFI U. . ST l S CE S DI . ATRt,FOKE, JJ I VA / . (1(j . .g -!gq , Jj I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI CO URT CT FOR TH E W ESTERN DISTRI OF VI CT RGI A NI ROANO KE DI SI W ON TROY PETERSON, Pl ntff ai i , DR. HAPPY S I c K , M TH, Dee f ndant . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) AIC 22 2 1 J 27 JJ t. . ' tL> D L BY; D CASE NO.7: 17CV001 31 M EM OM NDUM OPI ON NI By: Gln E. n a e Co r d Unie St e Dit c Judge td ats srit Tr Pe e s a l i a e pr ee ng pr # ,fl d t s cvi rg s compl i unde 42 oy t r on, t nm t oc di o t ie hi i l i ht ant r . U. C. j1 S. 983, algi t t t dee ntVigi a prs ofi i s f ld t prvi hi le ng ha he fnda r ni ion tcal aie o o de m te t nt f He tts C. Be aus Pe e s n ha f ie t updae hi maii a es f r a me or paii c e tro s a ld o ' s t lng ddr s or c mml c to a o tti c s ,h c u t l ds s t a to wi u prj ie o miains b u h s a e te o r wil imis he cin t t eudc . ho I t eo d rc n iin l fln t c s ( No. ) t c t'a v sd Pees n ta a n h r e o dto al iig he a e ECF y 3 , he out d ie tro h t f itr t updae li m alng a e sf t sca e afe a ta fr orr ea e fom i ar e ai alle o t ts ii ddr s or hi s tr r ns e el s r nc c r ton wo l r s l i d s sa o t i a to wih u prj ie A noiet c t'l i dt Pee s n u d e ut n imis l f h s cin t o t eudc . tc he outhal o tro e att addr s hel s pr ded f t sc s wasr t r t t c t m a ke a;t lve a e as he e s a t ovi or hi a e e u ned o he our, r d mdei r bl adcr s ed. Furhem or Pee s ha notc a t d t co ta le s t r e, tr on s ont c e he ur boutt sc esnc a lte t t hi as i e e tr o he ce k' ofi e, ec i d i J 201 lr s fc r eve n une 7. Ba ed on t f e ng,t c ltco l s he or goi he otr ncudest tPe e s no l nge wihest pr e d ha t ron o r s o oc e wih t s c s and t the ha f ie t pr e ut t s a ton,ptrua t Fe r Rul of Ci l t hi a e ha s al d o os c e hi c i ls nt o de al e vi Pr c d r 41b . Ac o dn l t c u t imis st ea t n wi u prj ie Se Balr v. o e u e ( ) c r igy,he o r d s se h ci t t eudc . e l d o ho a Peterson v. Smith et al Doc. 35 Ca lo ,8 2 F.d 9 , 6( t Ci. 98 )(ttn p o# .iia t aes b e tt tmerq ie n s rs n 8 2 3 9 4h r 1 9 saig r # l g n s r u j c o i e ur me t t a d rs c f r c u to d r a d ds sa i a a p o rae s n to f r no c mp in e ; n epe t o o r r e s n imis l s n p r p it a cin o n-o la c l Do n l v J h - mwil S lsCo . 6 7 F. 3 ,3 0 41 ( d Ci.1 8 )(e o nzn a n el . o nsM le ae p , 7 2d 39 4 - 3 r 9 2 r c g iig y dsrc c u tma s a s n e ds s a a to p ru n t Fe .R.Ci . 41b ) l Pees n itit o r y u po t imis n ci n u s a t o d v P. (). f tro Dockets.Justia.com . wihest pr ee wih t sac i he ma m ovet r pe t ca ewihi 30 daysfom e r of s o oc d t hi ton, y o eo n he s t n r nty t dimis lor r pr de t the de onsr t good c us f hi f im et updae t cour he s s a de , ovi d ha m taes a e or s al o t he t w ih a c r nta r s i t sc e a diec e t ur e dd e s n hi as s r t d. The Clr i die t d t s nd c e oft sm e or ndlm o ni n a t ac ompa ng e k s r c e o e opi s hi m a l pi o nd he c nyi o de t Pe e s n' pro a e sa t couns lofr co d f de e nt. r r o t r o s i r ddr s nd o e e r or f nda s ENTER: Thi JQW d y o Augus,201 s a f t 7. Unie St t Diti tJ t d aes src udge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.