Peterson v. Smith et al, No. 7:2017cv00131 - Document 35 (W.D. Va. 2017)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 8/29/2017. (tvt)
Download PDF
r- FRK' OFFI U. . ST l S CE S DI . ATRt,FOKE, JJ I VA / . (1(j . .g -!gq , Jj I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI CO URT CT FOR TH E W ESTERN DISTRI OF VI CT RGI A NI ROANO KE DI SI W ON TROY PETERSON, Pl ntff ai i , DR. HAPPY S I c K , M TH, Dee f ndant . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) AIC 22 2 1 J 27 JJ t. . ' tL> D L BY; D CASE NO.7: 17CV001 31 M EM OM NDUM OPI ON NI By: Gln E. n a e Co r d Unie St e Dit c Judge td ats srit Tr Pe e s a l i a e pr ee ng pr # ,fl d t s cvi rg s compl i unde 42 oy t r on, t nm t oc di o t ie hi i l i ht ant r . U. C. j1 S. 983, algi t t t dee ntVigi a prs ofi i s f ld t prvi hi le ng ha he fnda r ni ion tcal aie o o de m te t nt f He tts C. Be aus Pe e s n ha f ie t updae hi maii a es f r a me or paii c e tro s a ld o ' s t lng ddr s or c mml c to a o tti c s ,h c u t l ds s t a to wi u prj ie o miains b u h s a e te o r wil imis he cin t t eudc . ho I t eo d rc n iin l fln t c s ( No. ) t c t'a v sd Pees n ta a n h r e o dto al iig he a e ECF y 3 , he out d ie tro h t f itr t updae li m alng a e sf t sca e afe a ta fr orr ea e fom i ar e ai alle o t ts ii ddr s or hi s tr r ns e el s r nc c r ton wo l r s l i d s sa o t i a to wih u prj ie A noiet c t'l i dt Pee s n u d e ut n imis l f h s cin t o t eudc . tc he outhal o tro e att addr s hel s pr ded f t sc s wasr t r t t c t m a ke a;t lve a e as he e s a t ovi or hi a e e u ned o he our, r d mdei r bl adcr s ed. Furhem or Pee s ha notc a t d t co ta le s t r e, tr on s ont c e he ur boutt sc esnc a lte t t hi as i e e tr o he ce k' ofi e, ec i d i J 201 lr s fc r eve n une 7. Ba ed on t f e ng,t c ltco l s he or goi he otr ncudest tPe e s no l nge wihest pr e d ha t ron o r s o oc e wih t s c s and t the ha f ie t pr e ut t s a ton,ptrua t Fe r Rul of Ci l t hi a e ha s al d o os c e hi c i ls nt o de al e vi Pr c d r 41b . Ac o dn l t c u t imis st ea t n wi u prj ie Se Balr v. o e u e ( ) c r igy,he o r d s se h ci t t eudc . e l d o ho a Peterson v. Smith et al Doc. 35 Ca lo ,8 2 F.d 9 , 6( t Ci. 98 )(ttn p o# .iia t aes b e tt tmerq ie n s rs n 8 2 3 9 4h r 1 9 saig r # l g n s r u j c o i e ur me t t a d rs c f r c u to d r a d ds sa i a a p o rae s n to f r no c mp in e ; n epe t o o r r e s n imis l s n p r p it a cin o n-o la c l Do n l v J h - mwil S lsCo . 6 7 F. 3 ,3 0 41 ( d Ci.1 8 )(e o nzn a n el . o nsM le ae p , 7 2d 39 4 - 3 r 9 2 r c g iig y dsrc c u tma s a s n e ds s a a to p ru n t Fe .R.Ci . 41b ) l Pees n itit o r y u po t imis n ci n u s a t o d v P. (). f tro Dockets.Justia.com . wihest pr ee wih t sac i he ma m ovet r pe t ca ewihi 30 daysfom e r of s o oc d t hi ton, y o eo n he s t n r nty t dimis lor r pr de t the de onsr t good c us f hi f im et updae t cour he s s a de , ovi d ha m taes a e or s al o t he t w ih a c r nta r s i t sc e a diec e t ur e dd e s n hi as s r t d. The Clr i die t d t s nd c e oft sm e or ndlm o ni n a t ac ompa ng e k s r c e o e opi s hi m a l pi o nd he c nyi o de t Pe e s n' pro a e sa t couns lofr co d f de e nt. r r o t r o s i r ddr s nd o e e r or f nda s ENTER: Thi JQW d y o Augus,201 s a f t 7. Unie St t Diti tJ t d aes src udge 2