Manning v. Virginia Dept. of Corrections, et al, No. 7:2017cv00103 - Document 18 (W.D. Va. 2017)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 5/11/2017. (tvt)
Download PDF
O FRK' OFFI U.. BI COUU S CE S DI AT ROANOKE, VA Fi LED I TH E UN I N TED STATE S D I STR I CO U R T CT FO R TH E W E STER N DI STR I O F V I G I I CT R N A R O A N O K E DI SI N W O DOUGLAS R.M ANNI NG, MAt 11 2 1 27 JUL C. DL , I CL BY; CASE NO.7: 17CV001 03 Pl ntf , ai if M EM O M N D U M O PI I N N O W RGI A DEPT.OF CORRECTI NI ONS, c K , By: Gln E. nr d e Co a Chi fU nied St e D i t i tJudge e t at s s r c Dee fndants. t) Do l s R.M an ng,a Vigi a i t pr ee ng pr K ,fl t s cvi rght a ton ug a ni r ni nma e oc di o ied hi i l i s c i ptrua t 42 U. C.j1983,algi t thehasha difc te i prs i o ani lgal ls nt o S. le ng ha d fiulis n ion n bti ng e r s r h matra s a s ndi l ga m alt t co t. Upon r vi w oft r c d,t c t e ea c e i l nd e ng e l i o he urs e e he e or he our tndst tM a ng' c am sagans t def nda sheha nn e mus be s ma y dim is d. i ha nni s l i i t wo e nt s /m d t um dl s s e The c t i r quie t dimi s a a ton o c am fl d by a prs r agans a our s e r d o s s ny c i r l i ie ipne i t gover nt le iy orofke i t c tde e nest a ton o cli i i ous m ai i , nme a ntt l r f he our t nni he c i r am s vol , lcous o f i t sae acam u o whih rle ma beg a td r al o tt li p n c eif y r ne .28U. C.j 1 5 b ( ) M a nig s S. 91 A( )1. n n h sn lg lb ssf rj 1 8 camsa an tteVignaDe a t n o Co rcin (E a o e a a i o 9 3 li g i s h r i i p rme t f re to s : VDOC' ' ) o Dil n Co o a Ce tr G'lih r a S ae no i o t as a t i ter o f a r l wy nxdin l ne . iN et e l tt r t fkil ci n h i fkil s ng c p cte ae Ees n 'u e j 1 8 , a d ti r l as a pisE o r me tle t ista ae a a iis r p ro s nd r 9 35 n l s u e lo p l G ven n a ni e h t r 5 l e g t consde ed t r oft St t f rElve h Amendme pur e .' W ilv.M i hi a Dep' of i r a ms he ae' o e nt nt pos s' l c gn t S ae Po ie 4 U. 5 ,7 - ( 9 9 . Be a s t VDOC a d te p io ae p o e l tt lc , 91 S. 8 0 71 1 8 ) c u e he n h rs n r r p ry Manning v. Virginia Dept. of Corrections, et al ' Doc. 18 c i r n of t Commonwe 1h of Vigi a,t y cn onsdeed nns he at r ni he nnot be s d unde j 1 3. ue r 98 The ef r ,t cour wilsl a iy dim isa fi ousM n ng' co tt i lca msagans r o e he t l lmm rl s s s rvol nni s nsiutona li i t t s t de e nt .An a o it or rwile e t sda he e wo f nda s ppr pra e de l nt r hi y. Dockets.Justia.com ' W ad n Lar T.Ed n si a p ro s be tt s i t e j 1 3 a d M a nn ma r e ry mo d s es n u j c o ut md r 98 , n n ig y c niu wi h sj1 8 camsa ans ti d f n a ta t i tme By spaaeo d r t ec u t o tn e t i 9 3 li g i t h s e e d n t hs i . h e rt r e, h o r wildiec t c e kt a tm pts r i e ofpr e sont wa den. l r t he l r o te e vc oc s he r The Cl r i dieced t s nd co e of t s m e o a um opi on a ac om pa ng ek s r t o e pi s hi m r nd ni nd c nyi or rt pl i if de o antf. ENTER:Thi t da ofM a , 2017. s t y y Chi fU t St t sDititJ e ed a e src udge 1 h I l I ., : ; ! : . I ! 2